The Productivity of Doctors in Australia: The ‘Flat of the Curve’ and Beyond?
Physicians are one, albeit key, input into the production of better health and well being. There are two parts to the measurement of doctor productivity: activities performed and the value of those activities to society, via their impact on health and welfare. The former is easiest to measure, whilst the latter is more difficult since prices are unlikely to reflect patients valuations of services provided. In Australia, the quantity of services per doctor has been falling whilst the revenue from fees charged per FTE doctor has been increasing. This suggests that the increase in revenue per doctor is due entirely to increases in real prices. This is against a context of a reduction in the supply of hours by GPs and specialists balanced against weak evidence of an increase in the quality of GP services. Fewer services are being provided and costs are rising with unknown changes in quality. The net effect on population health depends on whether the forgone health gains of patients deterred from using health care due to price rises are lower than the potential increase in health from an increase in quality of care for those who do visit their GP. Further research should focus on the routine measurement and valuation of quality in clinical practice, with a focus on those aspects of doctor activity that patients’ value. As with many countries, there is little empirical evidence to determine the most cost-effective policies to improve doctor productivity.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2005|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia|
Phone: +61 3 8344 2100
Fax: +61 3 8344 2111
Web page: http://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Luke B. Connelly & Darrel P. Doessel, 2004. "Medical Expenditures and Health Status in Australia: A Story of Increasing or Decreasing Returns?," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 37(1), pages 12-30, 03.
- Mary O'Mahony & Lucy Stokes, 2005.
"Developing new approaches to measuring NHS outputs and productivity,"
NIESR Discussion Papers
264, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
- Diane Dawson & Hugh Gravelle & Mary O'Mahony & Andrew Street & Martin Weale & Adriana Castelli & Rowena Jacobs & Paul Kind & Pete Loveridge & Stephen Martin & Philip Stevens & Lucy Stokes, 2005. "Developing new approaches to measuring NHS outputs and productivity," Working Papers 006cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, revised Dec 2005.
- Zweifel, Peter & Manning, Willard G., 2000. "Moral hazard and consumer incentives in health care," Handbook of Health Economics,in: A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 8, pages 409-459 Elsevier.
- Eggleston, Karen, 2005. "Multitasking and mixed systems for provider payment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 211-223, January. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)