IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nursing Requirements for Ontario Over the Next Twenty Years: Development and Application of Estimation Methods


  • Stephen Birch
  • John Lavis
  • Barbara Markham
  • Christel Woodward
  • Linda-Lee O'Brien-Pallas


In this study we develop, appraise and compare alternative approaches to addressing the problem of determining the quantity and mix of nursing resources required for the health- care system in Ontario in the future. We argue that there is no ‘right’ number of nurses per se. On the contrary, the appropriate number of nurses is conditional upon society’s decisions about the right amount of health-care services to produce - decisions which are essentially political. A critical appraisal of the literature notes that existing research on nursing human resource planning has generally overlooked the political context of the issue (Section 2). Most studies focus attention exclusively on issues of the future supply of nurses and nursing hours. Some studies relate estimates of future supplies to assessments of the future need for nurses. However in these studies assessments of need have been based on adjusting or projecting current levels of provision in accordance with expected demographic changes in the populations being served (the utilization-based approach), or quantifying the resource requirements to meet the estimated burden of illness in the population (the needs-based approach). In some instances authors recognize that planning for future resources is largely determined by what governments decide to allocate to these resources. But this is usually dealt with in the studies by costing the utilization or needs-based requirements and noting that these requirements are likely to be in excess of even the most optimistic estimates of what governments might allocate to nursing resources (i.e., effective demand). In developing the alternative approaches for thinking about the future requirements for nurses a distinction is made between the conceptual basis of the model (i.e., the nature of the question being addressed) and the methodological approach used to apply the model (i.e., the nature of the data requirements) (Section 3). The utilization-based approach is essentially concerned with calculating the numbers of nurses required to serve the estimated future population in the same ways that the current population is served. The needs-based approach bases calculations of requirements on meeting the service needs of the estimated future population in cost-effective ways. The effective-demand-based approach calculates the number of nurses required by the health-care system within the context of current and future resource constraints. Although each approach requires different types of data, these requirements can be addressed by using existing values of the respective variables (i.e., projections), estimating future values of those variables based on exogenous changes (i.e., forecasts) or estimating future values of the variables based on exogenous and endogenous changes (i.e., plans). The applications of the alternative approaches are limited by the availability of appropriate data (Sections 4-6). However illustrative calculations are performed for the utilization and effective-demand based approaches and the sensitivity of the estimates to different assumptions is illustrated. In the case of the needs-based approach, the absence of any appropriate data prevented the illustration of the approach. In other studies, the absence of such information has lead to other types of data, in particular data on nurse vacancies, being used as an indicator of unmet need. Although corresponding data for Ontario are presented here (Section 5), these are not used to calculate future requirements because the determinants of these vacancy data have little, if anything, to do with needs. In summary, the resources required for an ongoing exercise in nurse human resources planning, in terms of the research skills and analytical techniques, already exist. But major issues remain about the willingness and/or ability of those agencies involved directly with issues of nurse human resources to invest in both the collection and management of appropriate data and the further development of analytical techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Birch & John Lavis & Barbara Markham & Christel Woodward & Linda-Lee O'Brien-Pallas, 1994. "Nursing Requirements for Ontario Over the Next Twenty Years: Development and Application of Estimation Methods," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 1994-13, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:199413

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 1994
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Jane Hall & Richard De Abreu Lourenco & Rosalie Viney, 1999. "Carrots and sticks-the fall and fall of private health insurance in Australia," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(8), pages 653-660.
    2. Vaithianathan, Rhema, 2002. "Will Subsidising Private Health Insurance Help the Public Health System?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 78(242), pages 277-283, September.
    3. Amir Shmueli, 2001. "The effect of health on acute care supplemental insurance ownership: an empirical analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 341-350.
    4. Besley, Timothy & Hall, John & Preston, Ian, 1999. "The demand for private health insurance: do waiting lists matter?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 155-181, May.
    5. Cutler, David M. & Zeckhauser, Richard J., 2000. "The anatomy of health insurance," Handbook of Health Economics,in: A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 563-643 Elsevier.
    6. Chiu, W. Henry, 1997. "Health insurance and the welfare of health care consumers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 125-133, April.
    7. Besley, Timothy & Coate, Stephen, 1991. "Public Provision of Private Goods and the Redistribution of Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(4), pages 979-984, September.
    8. Jonathan Gruber, 2000. "Tax Subsidies for Health Insurance: Evaluating the Costs and Benefits," NBER Working Papers 7553, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Garry F. Barrett & Robert Conlon, 2003. "Adverse Selection and the Decline in Private Health Insurance Coverage in Australia: 1989-95," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(246), pages 279-296, September.
    10. Mark Stabile, 2001. "Private insurance subsidies and public health care markets: evidence from Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 34(4), pages 921-942, November.
    11. Propper, Carol, 2000. "The demand for private health care in the UK," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 855-876, November.
    12. Jack, William, 1998. "Intergenerational Risk Sharing and Health Insurance Financing," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 74(225), pages 153-161, June.
    13. Jeremiah Hurley, 2001. "Ethics, Economics, and Public Financing of Health Care," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 2001-07, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
    14. Ettner, Susan L., 1997. "Adverse selection and the purchase of Medigap insurance by the elderly," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 543-562, October.
    15. Carol Propper & Alan Maynard, 1989. "The market for private health care and the demand for private insurance in Britain," Working Papers 053chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    16. Rhema Vaithianathan, 2001. "An Economic Analysis of the Private Health Insurance Incentive Act (1998)," CEPR Discussion Papers 427, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    17. Evans, R.G., 2000. "Financing Health Care: Taxation and the Alternatives," Centre for Health Services and Policy Research 2000:15d, University of British Columbia - Centre for Health Services and Policy Research..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Denton, Frank T. & Gafni, Amiram & Spencer, Byron G., 1995. "The SHARP way to plan health care services: A description of the system and some illustrative applications in nursing human resource planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-137, June.
    2. Stephen Birch & George Kephart & Gail Tomblin-Murphy & Linda O'Brien-Pallas & Rob Alder & Adrian MacKenzie, 2007. "Human Resources Planning and the Production of Health: A Needs-Based Analytical Framework," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 33(s1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Soong Chung & Doo Jung & Seong Yoon & DonHee Lee, 2010. "A dynamic forecasting model for nursing manpower requirements in the medical service industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 4(3), pages 225-236, December.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hpa:wpaper:199413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lyn Sauberli). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.