IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Foreign Monopoly and Trade Policy under Segmented and Integrated Markets

Listed author(s):
  • Ishikawa, Jota

This paper sets a single monopoly model and examines the effects of various trade policies on domestic, foreign and world economies under both segmented and integrated markets. In the segmented-markets case, the spillover effects which stem from non-constant marginal costs are explicitly dealt with. In the integrated-markets case, trade policies are examined in two different notions of market integration. Whether the markets are segmented or integrated, trade restrictions taken by one country may benefit the other country and/or the world economy. An application of the analysis is also given in the context of trade and environment.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University in its series Discussion Papers with number 1998-03.

in new window

Length: 33, [8] p.
Date of creation: Aug 1998
Handle: RePEc:hit:econdp:1998-03
Note: This Version: August 10, 1998 (First Draft: June 8, 1998), 分離された市場および統合された市場における外国の独占と貿易政策
Contact details of provider: Phone: +81-42-580-8000
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:econdp:1998-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.