IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Meaning Relatedness In Polysemous And Homonymous Words: An Erp Study In Russian


  • Anna Yurchenko

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Anastasiya Lopukhina

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Olga Dragoy

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)


Previous research showed that polysemous and homonymous words are processed differently. However, mechanisms underlying processing of ambiguous words are still unclear. The goal of the present study was to investigate comprehension of metonymies, metaphors, and homonyms using priming paradigm and the method of event-related potentials (ERPs). We asked participants to read two-word phrases with ambiguous words and make a sensicality judgement. The results demonstrated the difference between metonymic and metaphorical senses of polysemous words in the amount of priming for the literal sense. The priming effect between metonymic and literal senses supports the idea that these senses share a single representation in the mental lexicon. In contrast, metaphorical senses of polysemous words showed a very limited priming effect on literal senses of the same words. Similar results were observed for different meanings of homonymous words. We conclude that metaphorical senses should have separate representations in the mental lexicon similarly to homonyms

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Yurchenko & Anastasiya Lopukhina & Olga Dragoy, 2018. "Meaning Relatedness In Polysemous And Homonymous Words: An Erp Study In Russian," HSE Working papers WP BRP 67/LNG/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:67/lng/2018

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    ambiguous words; metonymy; metaphor; homonymy; event-related potentials; the Russian language;

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:67/lng/2018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamil Abdulaev) or (Shamil Abdulaev). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.