IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Sectoral EU-trading and other Climate Policy Options: Impacts on the Swedish Economy

Listed author(s):
  • Martin Hill
  • Bengt Kristöm


A recent Government bill suggests a sharpening of Sweden’s climate policy goals. Most importantly, Sweden’s Kyoto-commitment of emitting +4% carbon relative to the 1990 level has been revised. The new target translates into a reduction of carbon emissions by -4% relative to 1990. The policy package supporting the new target includes various subsidies and tax-swaps, but precludes the use of flexible mechanisms such as multilateral emission permit markets. A partial system for CO2 emission trading in selected energy sectors among member states is being developed by the EU-commission and is scheduled to be launched by 2005. This paper analyzes the effects on the Swedish economy of using different climate policy options, including an analysis of the “price tag” of abstaining from entering the EU-market. Our Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model indicates that a strictly domestic emission target, such as the one proposed in the government bill, is likely to be substantially more costly than by reaching the same aggregate CO2 target through the use of international permit trading. Emission trading is, however, not necessarily welfare enhancing if a partial system is used. Because the EU-proposal effectively covers only about 30% of Swedish carbon emissions, some potential efficiency gains are unavailable. We find that there are different “winners” and “losers” at the sector level, depending on which policy option is used. Because other countries have an incentive to “use” the emissions that Sweden now voluntarily abstains from, the climate policy proposals in the 2002 Government Bill may, after all, not reduce carbon emissions in Europe. We conclude that Sweden should actively take part in international discussions regarding multilateral climate agreements, and should promote proposals that have a broad coverage.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Economics in its series Working Paper Series with number 02/328.

in new window

Length: 32P
Date of creation: 07 Oct 2002
Handle: RePEc:hhs:slufec:2002_328
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 901 83 Umeå, Sweden

Phone: 090-786 62 68
Fax: 090-786 60 73
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:slufec:2002_328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Örjan Furtenback)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.