IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/ifswps/2007_011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fertility and relative cohort size

Author

Listed:
  • Sevilla, Jaypee

    (Harvard School of Public Health)

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect of changes in population age structure on fertility. Few factors are as inseparable from economic and demographic theories of underdevelopment as high fertility rates. Most of the empirical literature on fertility focuses on a small set of traditionally hypothesized determinants: incomes, men’s and women’s education, infant mortality, and the rural share of the population. More recently, Macunovich develops ideas by Easterlin about the potential impact of population age structure on fertility, and provides empirical evidence for its effects. We continue along the lines of Macunovich’s contribution by: (4) Estimating fertility equations in which age structure and the traditional determinants are included simultaneously. This may be interpreted as a test of robustness of one set of variables when controlling for the others. Or it may be interpreted as a test of hypotheses concerning the mechanisms whereby one set of variables affects fertility. (5) Testing for the consistency of cohort size effects across continents and between the developing and developed regions (6) Testing one aspect of the mechanism whereby cohort size is hypothesized to affect fertility, through women’s labor force participation. To accomplish these objectives, we econometrically estimate a static panel equation using aggregate panel data on the relevant variables for 90 developed and developing countries observed every 5 years over the period from 1950 to 1995. We find that: (4) Age structure effects are found in the hypothesized direction. They are remarkably large and very precisely estimated even after controlling for all the major competing determinants of fertility. Thus cohort size has strong effects that are independent of the effects of income, men’s and women’s labor force participation rates, men’s and women’s education, rurality, and infant mortality. (5) Cohort size effects are found in every continent within the developing world, as well as in the developed world. Their magnitudes are remarkably similar across continents and levels of development. Of all the variables included in the regressions, cohort size has the most consistently large and significant effect across all regions. (6) The estimates of cohort size effects survive controlling for women’s economic activity rates. This means that cohort size effects are mediated by more than women’s labor supply (and by more than all other effects controlled for in the specification). We are still in need of an empirically validated theory of why cohort size has a negative effect on fertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Sevilla, Jaypee, 2007. "Fertility and relative cohort size," Arbetsrapport 2007:11, Institute for Futures Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:ifswps:2007_011
    Note: ISSN 1652-120X; ISBN 978-91-85619-13-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.framtidsstudier.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/20071005123330filno7ST0tzOGE57TO7TmPI.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Macunovich, Diane J., 2011. "Re-Visiting the Easterlin Hypothesis: U.S. Fertility 1968-2010," IZA Discussion Papers 5885, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fertility; population; cohort size;

    JEL classification:

    • J10 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - General
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:ifswps:2007_011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Erika Karlsson). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/framtse.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.