IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-03966661.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Use of telehealth: evidence from French teleconsultation for women's healthcare, prior and during COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Carine Milcent

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Saad Zbiri

    (UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, teleconsultation were seldom used in France. The sanitary crisis has brought with it a great need for the use of teleconsultation and other interventions using digital technology. OBJECTIVE: Indentify how has French teleconsultation for obstetrics and gynecology care services been used prior and during this sanitary crisis. METHODS: We first described the global picture of the teleconsultation context prior to the sanitary crisis and then during the first quarantine and lockdown measures. We set up three aspects, namely: 1-use of teleconsultation as regards to providers' ability; 2- use of teleconsultation as regards to technology features; 3- use of teleconsultation for which type of healthcare. Second, we studied the determinant factors of teleconsultation use and those of provider's satisfaction with teleconsultation practice. RESULTS: We show the central role of training, the importance of some main digital technology benefits including improving public health, responding to patient's request and facilitating healthcare access, as well as the importance of some main digital technology drawbacks including lack of convenience and lack of veracity (truthfulness). CONCLUSIONS: Our results guide the regulator on the suppliers' motivation and needs for teleconsultation adoption. They highlight the conditions for an efficient use of teleconsultation.

Suggested Citation

  • Carine Milcent & Saad Zbiri, 2021. "Use of telehealth: evidence from French teleconsultation for women's healthcare, prior and during COVID-19 pandemic," Working Papers halshs-03966661, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03966661
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03966661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03966661/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carine Milcent & Saad Zbiri, 2018. "Prenatal care and socioeconomic status: effect on cesarean delivery," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Zijun Wang, 2012. "Regional variations in medical spending and utilization: a longitudinal analysis of US Medicare population," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 67-82, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carine Milcent & Saad Zbiri, 2021. "Use of telehealth: evidence from French teleconsultation for women's healthcare, prior and during COVID-19 pandemic," PSE Working Papers halshs-03966661, HAL.
    2. Carine Milcent & Saad Zbiri, 2020. "Use of telehealth: evidence from French teleconsultation for women's healthcare, prior and during COVID-19 pandemic," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03163281, HAL.
    3. Boris Augurzky & Thomas Kopetsch & Hendrik Schmitz, 2013. "What accounts for the regional differences in the utilisation of hospitals in Germany?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(4), pages 615-627, August.
    4. Svetlana N. Beilfuss & James A. Thornton, 2016. "Pathways and Hidden Benefits of Healthcare Spending Growth in the U.S," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 44(3), pages 363-375, September.
    5. Katharina Schley, 2018. "Health care service provision in Europe and regional diversity: a stochastic metafrontier approach," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Rouven Edgar Haschka & Katharina Schley & Helmut Herwartz, 2020. "Provision of health care services and regional diversity in Germany: insights from a Bayesian health frontier analysis with spatial dependencies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(1), pages 55-71, February.
    7. Ismaïl, Safa, 2022. "Caesarean section delivery in private and public facilities in Tunisia," MPRA Paper 111483, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Herwartz, Helmut & Schley, Katharina, 2018. "Improving health care service provision by adapting to regional diversity: An efficiency analysis for the case of Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 293-300.
    9. Saad Zbiri & Patrick Rozenberg & François Goffinet & Carine Milcent, 2018. "Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Carine Milcent & Saad Zbiri, 2022. "Supplementary private health insurance: The impact of physician financial incentives on medical practice," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 57-72, January.
    11. Thomas Kopetsch & Hendrik Schmitz, 2014. "Regional Variation In The Utilisation Of Ambulatory Services In Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(12), pages 1481-1492, December.
    12. Dirk Göpffarth & Thomas Kopetsch & Hendrik Schmitz, 2016. "Determinants of Regional Variation in Health Expenditures in Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(7), pages 801-815, July.
    13. José‐Luis Fernandez & Julien Forder, 2015. "Local Variability in Long‐Term Care Services: Local Autonomy, Exogenous Influences and Policy Spillovers," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 146-157, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Teleconsultation; Obstetrics and gynecology; Training; Technology features;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03966661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.