Author
Listed:
- Philippe Askenazy
(INSEE - Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE), CMH - Centre Maurice Halbwachs - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Département de Sciences sociales ENS-PSL - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)
- Ugo Di Nallo
(INSEE - Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE))
- Ismaël Ramajo
(DARES - Direction de l'animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques - Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Santé)
Abstract
This paper investigates the causal impact of post-Covid telework adoption on firm-level productivity in France, where hybrid work—typically around two days per week—has become the dominant form of telework. Using matched data from the Dares's ACEMO-Covid employer survey and Insee's FARE administrative database, we examine whether the share of teleworkers in 2022 is associated with productivity growth between 2019 and 2022 in the non-agricultural firms excluding finance and real estate. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimates reveal a positive but moderate relationship: a 10-percentage-point increase in telework share is associated with a 0.7 to 1.0-percentage point increase in labour productivity growth over the period. The relationship is non-linear, with marginal gains declining once the telework share exceeds roughly 20-30 percent. To address potential endogeneity—including reverse causality and unobserved firm characteristics—we implement an instrumental variable strategy based on the pre-pandemic configuration of firms' premises. Specifically, we use the surface per employee of rented office spaces physically separated from production or retail activities in 2019. Firms operating such separate office units were organizationally better positioned to adopt telework and potentially reduce real-estate costs. The instrument strongly predicts telework adoption and passes several validity checks. Two-stage least squares estimates yield a significantly larger causal effect with a semi-elasticity of about 0.27. The Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) implies that a 10-percentage-point increase in the telework share raises productivity growth by about 2.7 percentage-point. The IV coefficient suggests that productivity gains are concentrated among firms whose telework adoption was facilitated by their pre-existing organizational structure. Consistent with this interpretation, firms operating separate offices before the pandemic and adopting telework subsequently reduce obsolete office space and increase office equipment investment. However, these adjustments remain quantitatively limited, indicating that the estimated productivity gains likely reflect broader organizational and managerial changes associated with hybrid work arrangements.
Suggested Citation
Philippe Askenazy & Ugo Di Nallo & Ismaël Ramajo, 2026.
"Post-covid Telework and Productivity: A Large Scale Analysis,"
Working Papers
hal-05629578, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05629578
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://insee.hal.science/hal-05629578v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05629578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.