IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00525982.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contribution à la connaissance de la production de l'information financière : Le cas des provisions pour litiges

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Segura

    (UM1 - Université Montpellier 1)

Abstract

Les provisions pour litiges constituent aujourd'hui l'un des items les plus stratégiques et énigmatiques des états financiers. Que sait-on en effet de cette catégorie de provisions pour risques ? De leur conditions d'élaboration ? L'objectif de cet article vise précisément à comprendre et expliquer le processus décisionnel prévalant à leur formation. Deux questions de recherche sont ainsi posées : - Comment est prise la décision de provisionner un litige dans les grands groupes cotés ?- Quels sont les déterminants principaux de ce processus décisionnel ? Pour enquêter sur ces questions sensibles, une approche qualitative inspirée de la méthode de la théorie enracinée a été adoptée et 22 répondants ont été sollicités. Au final, trois résultats principaux émergent de cette recherche : - Le directeur financier gouverne quasiment seul le processus d'élaboration des provisions pour litiges, en laissant très peu de place aux conseillers juridiques, avocats, et auditeurs. - IAS 37 conditionne faiblement la manière dont le directeur financier décide. - Le profil psychologique du directeur financier est un déterminant majeur du montant provisionné.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Segura, 2008. "Contribution à la connaissance de la production de l'information financière : Le cas des provisions pour litiges," Post-Print halshs-00525982, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525982
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00525982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00525982/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skinner, Dj, 1994. "Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad-News," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 38-60.
    2. Joseph Aharony & Amihud Dotan, 2004. "A Comparative Analysis of Auditor, Manager and Financial Analyst Interpretations of SFAS 5 Disclosure Guidelines," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3‐4), pages 475-504, April.
    3. Hopwood, Anthony G., 1983. "On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 8(2-3), pages 287-305, May.
    4. Subramanyam, K. R., 1996. "The pricing of discretionary accruals," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1-3), pages 249-281, October.
    5. Kinney, William Jr. & McDaniel, Linda S., 1989. "Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 71-93, February.
    6. Gibbins, M & Richardson, A & Waterhouse, J, 1990. "The Management Of Corporate Financial Disclosure - Opportunism, Ritualism, Policies, And Processes," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 121-143.
    7. G.R. Chesley, 1986. "Interpretation of uncertainty expressions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 179-199, March.
    8. J. Holland, 1998. "Private disclosure and financial reporting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 255-269.
    9. Joseph Aharony & Amihud Dotan, 2004. "A Comparative Analysis of Auditor, Manager and Financial Analyst Interpretations of "SFAS 5" Disclosure Guidelines," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3-4), pages 475-504.
    10. John Holland, 2005. "A grounded theory of corporate disclosure," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 249-267.
    11. Walter P. Schuetze, 2001. "What Are Assets and Liabilities? Where Is True North? (Accounting That my Sister Would Understand)," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marvin Wee & Ann Tarca & Millicent Chang, 2014. "Disclosure incentives, mandatory standards and firm communication in the IFRS adoption setting," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(2), pages 265-291, May.
    2. Rolf Brühl & Nils Horch & Mathias Orth, 2008. "Grounded Theory und ihre bisherige Anwendung in der empirischen Controlling- und Rechnungswesenforschung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 299-323, December.
    3. Aerts, Walter, 2005. "Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 493-517, August.
    4. W. Aerts, 2001. "Inertia in the attributional content of annual accounting narratives," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 3-32.
    5. Katarzyna Kolesnik & Sylwia Silska-Gembka & Jerzy Gierusz, 2019. "The Interpretation of the Verbal Probability Expressions Used in The IFRS – The Differences Observed Between Polish and British Accounting Professionals," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 25-49, March.
    6. Araceli Mora Enguidanos & Juan Manuel García Lara & Beatriz García Osma & Ana Gisbert Clemente, 2004. "La Comparabilidad De La Información Contable En Europa: Efectos De La Manipulación Contable Sobre El Nivel De Conservadurismo," Working Papers. Serie EC 2004-14, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    7. Dimitropoulos, Panagiotis E. & Asteriou, Dimitrios, 2010. "The effect of board composition on the informativeness and quality of annual earnings: Empirical evidence from Greece," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 190-205, June.
    8. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    9. Chen, Changling & Kim, Jeong-Bon & Yao, Li, 2017. "Earnings smoothing: Does it exacerbate or constrain stock price crash risk?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 36-54.
    10. John Holland, 2005. "A grounded theory of corporate disclosure," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 249-267.
    11. Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna & Richardson, Vernon J. & Scholz, Susan, 2004. "Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 59-89, February.
    12. Wendy Rotenberg, 1994. "Discussion of “The Voluntary Inclusion of Forecasts in the MD&A Section of Annual Reportsâ€," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 489-496, June.
    13. Bikki Jaggi & Chen-lung Chin & Hsiou-wei William Lin & Picheng Lee, 2006. "Earnings forecast disclosure regulation and earnings management: evidence from Taiwan IPO firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 275-299, May.
    14. Habib, Ahsan & Jiang, Haiyan & Bhuiyan, Md. Borhan Uddin & Islam, Ainul, 2014. "Litigation risk, financial reporting and auditing: A survey of the literature," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 145-163.
    15. Louis, Henock & Robinson, Dahlia, 2005. "Do managers credibly use accruals to signal private information? Evidence from the pricing of discretionary accruals around stock splits," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 361-380, June.
    16. Sylvain Durocher, 2009. "The future of interpretive accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 137-159, July.
    17. Marc Badia & Miguel Duro & Bjorn N. Jorgensen & Gaizka Ormazabal & Hans B. Christensen, 2020. "The Informational Effects of Tightening Oil and Gas Disclosure Rules," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1720-1755, September.
    18. Mingyi Hung & Yongtae Kim & Siqi Li, 2018. "Political connections and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from around the world," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(3), pages 272-302, April.
    19. Brennan, Niamh M. & Edgar, Victoria C. & Power, Sean Bradley, 2022. "COVID-19 profit warnings: Delivering bad news in a time of crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    20. Devalle, Alain & Rizzato, Fabio & Busso, Donatella, 2016. "Disclosure indexes and compliance with mandatory disclosure—The case of intangible assets in the Italian market," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 8-25.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    provisions; litiges; IAS37; méthode qualitative;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.