Kaldor et la théorie keynésienne de la répartition
Kaldor presents the analysis which he makes of the distribution as a Keynesian theory. His work is inspired, he says to us, by contributions of Keynes, in the Treatise on Money, and by Kalecki. However, while Keynes and Kalecki develop analyses of short period, Kaldor describes the characteristics of a long period equilibrium so that the mechanism on which the adjustment is based, the flexibility of profit margins, is inappropriate. Pasinetti, by suggesting that the article of Kaldor rests on a logical slip and that the correction of this error shows that the rate of profit — in long period equilibrium — depends only on the natural growth rate of the economy and on the capitalists' propensity to save, boosted the debate. However, his thesis seems debatable. On one hand, equilibrium that he describes is not unique and it is possible that, in certain circumstances, the economy aims towards another equilibrium the characteristics of which are determined by the wage-earners' propensity to save. On the other hand, the idea that the saving's function proposed by Kaldor is logically inconsistent is unfounded. Finally, the crucial hypothesis on which rests the reasoning of Pasinetti, the existence of a class of individuals who earn only profit appears to characterize hardly in a relevant way the economic systems which prevail in advanced economies.
|Date of creation:||06 Jan 2012|
|Publication status:||Published in Cahiers d'Economie Politique, L'Harmattan, 2012, 61, pp.113-155|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00143948v3|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00143948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.