IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00116775.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Future of Key Actors in the European Research Area

Author

Listed:
  • Madeleine Akrich

    () (CSI i3 - Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation i3 - MINES ParisTech - École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris - PSL - PSL Research University - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Riel Miller

    () (DTI - Danish Technology Institute - Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation)

Abstract

This text is the synthesis report based on the work of the High Level Expert Group on the Future of Research Actors (RA) in the European Research Area (ERA). This group was set up by the Technology Foresight Group, DG Research, European Commision. Many of the conclusions of this synthesis report are fully consistent with the directions of current research policies. The work of the group highlights the importance of efforts, already well underway, to reinforce the functioning of the ERA as an integrated base that overcomes a wide range of geographic, institutional and disciplinary barriers to the both the competition and sharing of knowledge. Knitting together the different European research actors into a more transparent and diversified whole would seem to be one of the best ways to create a stronger platform for knowledge creation and diffusion. A less anticipated conclusion, and less part of the existing consensus, is that simply pursuing the ambition of multiplying the number of effective research platforms in Europe may miss a key part of tomorrow's research agenda. The in-depth expert papers on the eight different research actors of the ERA, the insights arising from the synthesis developed in this paper, and the analytical results of a rare scenario pooling exercise, all point very clearly to the risk that current policies are excessively technology centric and may miss crucial emerging attributes of research and research actors in the knowledge society. Thus, over and above the value- added for assessing the direction and implementation of current approaches to improving the production and use of research in Europe, this report recommends new policies aimed at accelerating the development of emergent forms and sources of research. The policy message is that Europe must move beyond industrial-era challenges to embrace those of the knowledge society. Further opening, expanding and integrating the European Research Area requires: 1) Policies that put into practice expanded criteria for designing and funding research programmes for the European Research Area to include user-centred technological, organisational and social innovation. 2) Policies that initiate experiments that validate (quality/trust/transparency) new forms and producers (including individual independent researchers) of knowledge. 3) Policies, both budgetary and regulatory, that create and facilitate both new collaborative environments for research, including user-centred research, and new governance processes.4) Policies to enhance the capacity of policy makers (including at the regional level) to recognise and facilitate new forms of research and particularly new approaches to the governance of research processes. 5) Policies to abolish national borders for researchers and for students both within Europe and outside Europe. 6) Policies to strengthen the autonomy of universities, including areas so far strictly controlled by most governments such as a university's strategic profile and selection of specialisations. 7) Further research is required regarding the relationship between the changing nature of research and intellectual property rights (IPR). 8) Further research is required regarding the functional division of labour amongst different research actors in the context of the emerging “open innovation model”. 9) Further research is required in order to describe and analyse the contribution of civil society to research and innovation. 10) Further research is required on how to establish trust in highly complex and diversified knowledge societies. 11) Further research is required to define and measure new forms of innovation, particularly with respect to the innovation related research occurring in the service sector, SMEs and the community (social innovation) that point towards new models of innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Madeleine Akrich & Riel Miller, 2007. "The Future of Key Actors in the European Research Area," Post-Print halshs-00116775, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00116775 Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00116775v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00116775v2/document
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alain Bonnafous, 1999. "Infrastructures publiques et financement privé : le paradoxe de la rentabilité financière," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 51(1), pages 157-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Havas, Attila, 2007. "Devising futures for universities in a multi-level structure: A methodological experiment," MPRA Paper 66341, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    RESEARCH ORGANIZATION; UNIVERSITIES; CIVIL SOCIETY; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES; SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES; NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS; REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS; RESEARCH POLICIES; RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS; FORESIGHT; EUROPE;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
    1. Socio-Economics of Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00116775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.