IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03434987.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inclusion, reconnaissance et bien-être au travail : quelle articulation ?

Author

Listed:
  • Romuald Grouille

    (VALLOREM - Val de Loire Recherche en Management - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours)

  • Daniel Leroy

    (VALLOREM - Val de Loire Recherche en Management - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours)

Abstract

L'inclusion est une thématique centrale de la GRH dont les fondements théoriques demeurent flous. Elle induit une double logique d'appartenance et d'unicité qui ne sauraient être effective sans reconnaissance par le groupe et l'organisation d'appartenance. Si reconnaissance et l'inclusion semblent liés, peu de travaux les ont étudiés conjointement, ce que nous avons entrepris en lien avec le bien-être au travail, bénéfice attendu de ces deux construits. Nos résultats tendent à indiquer que la reconnaissance constitue un mécanisme central de l'inclusion, en premier lieu par la satisfaction du besoin d'appartenance. Nous concluons sur les leviers mobilisables par le MRH à cette fin.

Suggested Citation

  • Romuald Grouille & Daniel Leroy, 2021. "Inclusion, reconnaissance et bien-être au travail : quelle articulation ?," Post-Print hal-03434987, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03434987
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03434987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03434987/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nawel Ayadi & Corina Paraschiv & Eric Vernette, 2019. "Vers un référentiel théorique interdisciplinaire synthétique du bien être individuel," Post-Print halshs-02450784, HAL.
    2. Le Huong & Connie Zheng & Yuka Fujimoto, 2016. "Inclusion, organisational justice and employee well-being," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 945-964, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maha Dajani & Mohamad Saad Mohamad, 2017. "Perceived Organisational Injustice and Counterproductive Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Work Alienation Evidence from the Egyptian Public Sector," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(5), pages 192-192, April.
    2. Diane Pelly & Orla Doyle, 2022. "Nudging in the workplace: increasing participation in employee EDI wellness events," Working Papers 202208, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    3. Landisoa Rabeson & Corina Paraschiv & Laurent Bertrandias & Régis Chenavaz, 2022. "Couple Ethical Purchase Behavior and Joint Decision Making: Understanding the Interaction Process and the Dynamics of Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03434987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.