IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Impacts and cost-effectiveness of major energy efficiency policies for existing buildings: what do we exactly know and what can we learn?

Listed author(s):
  • Jean-Sébastien Broc

    ()

    (B R & C - Broc Research & Consulting - IEECP - Institute for European Energy and Climate Policy)

  • Catherine Guermont

    (Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie - ADEME)

  • Christian Deconninck

    (ATEE - Association Technique Energie Environnement)

  • Marie-Laure Nauleau

    (Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie - ADEME)

Registered author(s):

    There have been many reviews about how energy efficiency policies for existing buildings work, but more rarely about the details of their effective impacts and costs, mainly due to difficulties in accessing data. The National Energy Efficiency Action Plans enable to know what policies are implemented and how. But details about their impacts and costs can often be found in national language only, and rarely in a single report (if available at all). This paper presents an analysis of ex-post evaluations and monitoring reports available for 13 major energy efficiency schemes for retrofitting buildings. The first part reviews the data about evaluation methods, energy savings, and costs. It describes the main data found and discusses to what extent these data can be compared. This stresses the need for in-depth study to correctly analyse the data. The second part proposes a methodology to compare results and costs of different policies, illustrated by one pilot comparison between the Italian and the French tax credit schemes. This example shows the importance to take into account the differences in the scope and methods used to estimate the impacts and costs when comparing indicators such as cost-effectiveness ratios. The paper concludes with a discussion about the need to promote information sharing between the Member States and evidence-based approaches for the design and management of energy efficiency policies.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01577516/document
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-01577516.

    as
    in new window

    Length:
    Date of creation: 29 May 2017
    Publication status: Published in Consumption, Efficiency & Limits, May 2017, Hyères, France. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Proceedings of the ECEEE 2017 Summer Study, pp.1747-1758, 2017, paper 8-121-17.
    Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01577516
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01577516
    Contact details of provider: Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. Anna Alberini & Andrea Bigano & Marco Boeri, 2013. "Looking for Free-riding: Energy Efficiency Incentives and Italian Homeowners," Working Papers 2013.24, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01577516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.