IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00780200.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Approche régulationniste de la diversité des dispositifs institutionnels environnementaux des pays de l'OCDE

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Elie

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Bertrand Zuindeau

    () (CLERSE - Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 - ULCO - Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mathieu Bécue

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • M. Camara
  • Ali Douai

    () (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) - COMUE UCA - COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • André Meunié

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Dans la lignée de travaux régulationnistes sur la diversité des capitalismes, cet article a pour objet d'analyser l'hypothèse d'une diversité des « dispositifs institutionnels environnementaux » (DIE) des pays de l'OCDE. En recourant à plusieurs méthodes d'analyse de données, il s'agit successivement de mettre en évidence les axes factoriels permettant de structurer cette diversité et de réaliser une typologie des diverses catégories de pays au regard de leurs DIE. Une comparaison est alors faite avec la typologie des catégories de capitalisme de Bruno Amable (2005). L'exercice comparatif n'apparaît probant que pour les économies de type libéral et celles qui relèvent du « capitalisme méditerranéen ». Une explication de ce lien paraît pouvoir être apportée par une analyse en termes de complémentarité institutionnelle entre les DIE et les formes institutionnelles (ou domaines institutionnels) constituant les formes de capitalisme.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Elie & Bertrand Zuindeau & Mathieu Bécue & M. Camara & Ali Douai & André Meunié, 2012. "Approche régulationniste de la diversité des dispositifs institutionnels environnementaux des pays de l'OCDE," Post-Print hal-00780200, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00780200
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00780200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noel Castree, 2008. "Neoliberalising Nature: The Logics of Deregulation and Reregulation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(1), pages 131-152, January.
    2. Leach, Melissa & Mearns, Robin & Scoones, Ian, 1999. "Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Community-Based Natural Resource Management," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 225-247, February.
    3. Stern, David I., 2004. "The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1419-1439, August.
    4. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    5. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "The Contingent Governance Of Teams: Analysis Of Institutional Complementarity," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 14, pages 230-249, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Lynne Chester, 2010. "Determining the economic-environment relation: a regulationist approach," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 17-42.
    7. Joachim Becker & Werner G. Raza, 2000. "Theory of Regulation and Political Ecology: An Inevitable Separation?," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2000_05, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    8. Ali Douai & Matthieu Montalban, 2012. "Institutions and the environment: the case for a political socio-economy of environmental conflicts," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 1199-1220.
    9. Arild Vatn, 2005. "Institutions and the Environment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2826.
    10. Becker, Joachim & Raza, Werner G., 2000. "Theory of regulation and political ecology. An inevitable separation?," SRE-Discussion Papers 2000/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    11. Bruno Boidin & Bertrand Zuindeau, 2006. "Socio-économie de l'environnement et du développement durable : état des lieux et perspectives," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 135(3), pages 7-37.
    12. Stern, David I. & Common, Michael S. & Barbier, Edward B., 1996. "Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1151-1160, July.
    13. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    14. Vatn, Arild, 2005. "Rationality, institutions and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 203-217, November.
    15. Bruno Amable, 2005. "Les cinq capitalismes. Diversité des systèmes économiques et sociaux dans la mondialisation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00310487, HAL.
    16. Shafik, Nemat & Bandyopadhyay, Sushenjit, 1992. "Economic growth and environmental quality : time series and cross-country evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 904, The World Bank.
    17. Hall, Peter A. & Taylor, Rosemary C. R., 1996. "Political science and the three new institutionalisms," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    18. Magnani, Elisabetta, 2000. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 431-443, March.
    19. Bruno Amable & Stefano Palombarini, 2005. "L'économie politique n'est pas une science morale," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00310486, HAL.
    20. Vatn, Arild, 2009. "An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2207-2215, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre BERTHE & Luc ELIE, 2014. "Les conséquences environnementales des inégalités économiques : structuration théorique et perspectives de recherche (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2014-18, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    2. Cahen-Fourot, Louison, 2019. "The social relation to the environment in contemporary capitalism: theoretical reflections and empirical explorations," Ecological Economic Papers 26, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    3. Cahen-Fourot, Louison, 2020. "Contemporary capitalisms and their social relation to the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environnement; dispositifs institutionnels environnementaux; diversité des capitalismes; complémentarité institutionnelle; analyse comparative;

    JEL classification:

    • P51 - Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00780200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.