IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gwi/wpaper/2016-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

At the Intersection of Cross-Border Information Flows and Human Rights: TPP as a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Ariel Aaronson

    (Department of Economics/Institute for International Economic Policy, George Washington University)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "At the Intersection of Cross-Border Information Flows and Human Rights: TPP as a Case Study," Working Papers 2016-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    • Handle: RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2016-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gwu.edu/~iiep/assets/docs/papers/2016WP/AaronsonIIEPWP2016-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kawauchi, Junko & Shinohara, Takeshi & Yokozawa, Makoto, 2015. "Study on factors for evaluating the economic impact of data localization requirement policies on the IT industry," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127154, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "The Digital Trade Imbalance and Its Implications for Internet Governance," Working Papers 2016-7, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    3. Aaronson,Susan Ariel & Zimmerman,Jamie M., 2007. "Trade Imbalance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521872560, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Governance Spillovers of Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements," Working Papers 2017-2, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    2. International Organisation, 2017. "Handbook on Assessment of Labour Provisons in Trade and Investment Arrangements," Working Papers id:11929, eSocialSciences.
    3. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Digital Sovereignty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-67.
    4. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "What Are We Talking About When We Discuss Digital Protectionism?," Working Papers 2017-9, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    5. World Bank, 2012. "From Political to Economic Awakening : The Path of Economic Integration - Deauville Partnership Report on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment, Volume 2. Main Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 11887, The World Bank Group.
    6. Bagchi, Kaushambi & Kapilavai, Sashank, 2018. "Political Economy of Data Nationalism," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190347, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Ida Bastiaens & Evgeny Postnikov, 2020. "Social standards in trade agreements and free trade preferences: An empirical investigation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 793-816, October.
    8. Lisa Lechner, 2016. "The domestic battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 840-871, September.
    9. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2022. "Soberanía digital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Número Es, pages 1-1.
    10. World Bank, 2012. "From Political to Economic Awakening in the Arab World : The Path of Economic Integration - Deauville Partnership Report on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment, Volume 1. Overview Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 11886, The World Bank Group.
    11. Tao Jiang & Yizhu Hu & Fazli Haleem & Shaolong Zeng, 2023. "Do Digital Trade Rules Matter? Empirical Evidence from TAPED," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Digital sovereignty," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19.
    13. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2010. "Unexpected Bedfellows: The GATT, the WTO, and Some Democratic Rights," Working Papers 2010-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2016-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kyle Renner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iigwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.