A Set-Theoretical Comparison of C2 Social Choice Correspondences
Given the choice sets produced by a pair of Condorcet social choice correspondence, the following intersting questions arise. Does one of these sets always contain the other? If not, do they always interest or on the contrary can they have an empty intersection? Laffond, Laslier and Le Breton (1995) answer these questions for Condorcet social choice correspondences based exclusively on the simple majority relation, callaed C1 choice correspondences by Fishburn (1977). In the present paper, we conduct the same task for five Condorcet correspondences that require the size of the majorities to operate.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||1996|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.fundp.ac.be/facultes/eco/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:nodapa:180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.