IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fem/femwpa/2014.87.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Partnerships for a Better Governance of Natural Hazard Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Calliari

    (Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei)

  • Jaroslav Mysiak

    (Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei)

  • Silvia Santato

    (Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei)

  • María Máñez Costa

    (Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht (HZG), Centre for Materials and Coastal Research (Germany))

Abstract

This paper discusses the role played by decentralized, voluntary multi-stakeholder partnerships between public authorities and agencies and/or public authorities and civil society for disaster risk reduction. We pay attention to Public – Public Partnerships (PuP), a term coined for public alliances in the early 2000s although arguably building upon community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) and disaster risk reduction (CBDRR), as well as other cooperative initiatives. In many respects PuPs became known as a counterpart of PPPs and quickly spread in public water and health service provision. While the concept of PuPs match to some extent the European Union’s efforts to expand horizontal cooperation and collaboration, it appears too narrow to capture the sense of European initiatives. In particular, the strict exclusion of business and commercial undertakings in the essence of PuPs by early scholars is not compatible with the call for truly cooperative multi-governance arrangements. The paper examines the concept of PuP, its objectives and defining characteristics, partners involved and relationship tying them. It then moves to understand to what extent partnerships meant to improve cooperation and coordination have permeated the EU legislation and policies, focusing especially on the role of inclusive governance and territorial cooperation. The analysis is complemented by examples of PuPs addressed in the ENHANCE case studies in which disaster risk reduction plays a role.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Calliari & Jaroslav Mysiak & Silvia Santato & María Máñez Costa, 2014. "Partnerships for a Better Governance of Natural Hazard Risks," Working Papers 2014.87, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  • Handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2014.87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://feem-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/NDL2014-087.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Magnette, 2003. "European Governance and Civic Participation: Beyond Elitist Citizenship?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(1), pages 144-160, March.
    2. Jaroslav Mysiak & C. D. Pérez-Blanco, 2015. "Partnerships for Affordable and Equitable Disaster Insurance," Working Papers 2015.40, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Patsias & Anne Latendresse & Laurence Bherer, 2013. "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2214-2230, November.
    2. Zoltan GRUNHUT, 2020. "The ‘Expertisation’ of European Studies. A critical perspective on discursive institutionalism Abstract: The paper puts into perspective the conceptual evolution of European Studies and one of its lat," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 252-272, June.
    3. Maria Pettersson & Marleen van Rijswick & Cathy Suykens & Meghan Alexander & Kristina Ek & Sally Priest, 2017. "Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 929-944, November.
    4. Vivien A. Schmidt, 2009. "Re-Envisioning the European Union: Identity, Democracy, Economy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 17-42, September.
    5. Shweta Sinha & Nitin K. Tripathi, 2016. "Assessing the Challenges in Successful Implementation and Adoption of Crop Insurance in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Jonathan S Davies, 2012. "Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2687-2704, November.
    7. Andrei MORARU, 2016. "European Union Democratic Governance: A Case Study Of The European Citizens’ Initiative," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31.
    8. Kendall, Jeremy, 2005. "Third sector European policy: organisations between market and state, the policy process and the EU," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29007, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Riccardo Viale & Henry Etzkowitz (ed.), 2010. "The Capitalization of Knowledge," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13300.
    10. Sergei Shein, 2020. "EU Political System’s Resilience In The Age Of Politicization: Lessons From The 2019 European Parliament Elections," HSE Working papers WP BRP 35/IR/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Vivien Schmidt, 2010. "Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited - Input, Output and Throughput," KFG Working Papers p0021, Free University Berlin.
    12. John R Parkins & A John Sinclair, 2014. "Patterns of Elitism within Participatory Environmental Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 746-761, August.
    13. Aude Bicquelet & Helen Addison, 2017. "How to refuse a vote on the EU? The case against the referendum in the House of Commons (1974–2010)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2141-2162, September.
    14. Changwoo Shon & Myoungsoon You, 2020. "Evaluation of Health Policy Governance in the Introduction of the New DRG-Based Hospital Payment System from Interviews with Policy Elites in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Magnette, Paul & Papadopoulos, Yannis, 2008. "On the politicization of the European consociation: A middle way between Hix and Bartolini," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 1, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    16. Matilde Luna & José Luis Velasco, 2010. "Knowledge Networks: Integration Mechanisms and Performance Assessment," Chapters, in: Riccardo Viale & Henry Etzkowitz (ed.), The Capitalization of Knowledge, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Mansbridge, Jane, 2008. "A "Selection Model" of Political Representation," Working Paper Series rwp08-010, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    18. Hall, David & Katko, Tapio & Sanz Mulas, Andres & Lobina, Emanuele & de la Motte, Robin, 2007. "Decision-making and participation: The Watertime results," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 151-159, June.
    19. Ritzen, Jo & Haas, Jasmina & Neeleman, Annemarie & Teixeira, Pedro N., 2016. "European Identity and the Learning Union," IZA Policy Papers 121, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Kendall, Jeremy & Fraisse, Laurent, 2005. "The European Statute of Association: why an obscure but contested symbol in a sea of indifference and scepticism?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29018, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public-public partnerships; Disaster Risk Reduction; Smart Regulation; Cohesion Policy and Territorial Cooperation; Po River Basin; Jucar River Basin; Wadden Sea; Natural Hazard Partnership;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2014.87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto Prina Cerai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feemmit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.