IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/iserwp/2016-09.html

Survey-based cross-country comparisons where countries vary in sample design: issues and solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn, Peter
  • Kaminska, Olena

Abstract

In multi-national surveys different countries usually implement different sample designs. When making estimates of differences between countries, analysts often fail to take sample design appropriately into account. This failure is sometimes because variables indicating stratification, clustering or weighting are unavailable, partially available, or in a form unsuitable for cross-national analysis. We demonstrate how complex sample design should be taken into account when estimating differences between countries and we provide practical guidance to analysts and to data producers. Using EU-SILC data for 19 countries, we evaluate the inverse mis-specification effect (imeff) that results from ignoring aspects of design. Our empirical findings illustrate the importance of incorporating appropriate sample design indicators in variance estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn, Peter & Kaminska, Olena, 2016. "Survey-based cross-country comparisons where countries vary in sample design: issues and solutions," ISER Working Paper Series 2016-09, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2016-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/iser/2016-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Dolapo Adeyanju & John Mburu & Wainaina Gituro & Chepchumba Chumo & Djana Mignouna & Adebayo Ogunniyi & John Kehinde Akomolafe & Joseph Ejima, 2023. "Assessing food security among young farmers in Africa: evidence from Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Christopher S. Walter & Marie-Rachelle Narcisse & Jennifer L. Vincenzo & Pearl A. McElfish & Holly C. Felix, 2021. "Description of Variation in Age of Onset of Functional Limitations of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders Compared to Other Racial and Ethnic Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-8, March.
    4. Stavros Poupakis & Francesco Salustri, 2024. "Asynchronous fieldwork in cross-country surveys: an application to physical activity," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 1303-1318, September.
    5. Álvaro Fuentes-Merlos & Domingo Orozco-Beltrán & Jose A. Quesada Rico & Raul Reina, 2021. "Quality-of-Life Determinants in People with Diabetes Mellitus in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Abdul Waheed & Qingyu Zhang, 2022. "Effect of CSR and Ethical Practices on Sustainable Competitive Performance: A Case of Emerging Markets from Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 837-855, February.
    7. Magdalena Poteralska & Jolanta Perek-Białas, 2025. "Do Weights and Complex Design Matter in Structural Equation Modeling for Social Studies? An Example of the Political Satisfaction-Political Trust Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 923-953, September.
    8. Ortmanns Verena, 2020. "Explaining Inconsistencies in the Education Distributions of Ten Cross-National Surveys – the Role of Methodological Survey Characteristics," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 379-409, June.
    9. Peter Lynn & Lucinda Platt & Alita Nandi & Violetta Parutis, 2018. "Design and implementation of a high-quality probability sample of immigrants and ethnic minorities: Lessons learnt," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(21), pages 513-548.
    10. Ortmanns Verena, 2020. "Explaining Inconsistencies in the Education Distributions of Ten Cross-National Surveys – the Role of Methodological Survey Characteristics," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 379-409, June.
    11. Levi, Sebastian & Goldberg, Matthew H., 2021. "Democracy influences climate change concern," SocArXiv 6vk9d, Center for Open Science.
    12. Emma Samman & Lauren Pandolfelli & Claudia Cappa, 2025. "Exploring the Relationship Between Disability and Children’s Household Chores in Selected Low- and Middle-Income Countries," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2016-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.