IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/jumsac/334179.html

Work less, live more? The impact of an introduction of the Four-Day Working Week on happiness in the context of the Icelandic Four-Day Working Week experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Joyeaux, Marie-Claire

Abstract

In our current age, the quest for a better work-life balance is becoming paramount to increasing numbers of people. The concept of the Four-Day Working Week (FDWW) therefore emerges as a potential solution, promising to revolutionise our traditional understanding of worktime and well-being. By focusing on the world's largest FDWW trial at the time, Iceland's FDWW experiment from 2015 to 2019, and using data from the European Social Survey, the FDWW's impact on happiness is critically examined. Ordinary Least Squares regressions are employed to analyse the association of working hours with happiness amongst Icelandic workers and to conduct an evidence-based policy evaluation. Contrary to widespread expectations and existing media narratives, the findings reveal no significant impact of working hours on employees' happiness scores. This outcome challenges the conventional wisdom that less work leads directly to more happiness. The findings thereby contribute significantly to debates on the future of work, suggesting that the FDWW should be viewed with caution until more conclusive evidence is available. This absence of definitive proof calls into question the notion of the FDWW as a universally effective solution to the economic and social challenges faced by contemporary society.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyeaux, Marie-Claire, 2025. "Work less, live more? The impact of an introduction of the Four-Day Working Week on happiness in the context of the Icelandic Four-Day Working Week experiment," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(4), pages 831-857.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:334179
    DOI: 10.5282/jums/v10i4pp831-857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/334179/1/1945725656.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5282/jums/v10i4pp831-857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaminska Olena & Lynn Peter, 2017. "Survey-Based Cross-Country Comparisons Where Countries Vary in Sample Design: Issues and Solutions," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 123-136, March.
    2. Andrew E. Clark & Orsolya Lelkes, 2005. "Deliver us from evil: religion as insurance," PSE Working Papers halshs-00590570, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Winkelmann, 2009. "Unemployment, Social Capital, and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 421-430, August.
    2. Elvire Guillaud, 2013. "Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, March.
    3. Magdalena Poteralska & Jolanta Perek-Białas, 2025. "Do Weights and Complex Design Matter in Structural Equation Modeling for Social Studies? An Example of the Political Satisfaction-Political Trust Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 923-953, September.
    4. Graham, Liam & Oswald, Andrew J., 2010. "Hedonic capital, adaptation and resilience," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 372-384, November.
    5. Ortmanns Verena, 2020. "Explaining Inconsistencies in the Education Distributions of Ten Cross-National Surveys – the Role of Methodological Survey Characteristics," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 379-409, June.
    6. Leonardo Becchetti & Sara Savastano, 2011. "Erratum to: The Money–Happiness Relationship in Transition Countries: Evidence from Albania," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 18(1), pages 216-216, September.
    7. van Hoorn, André & Maseland, Robbert, 2013. "Does a Protestant work ethic exist? Evidence from the well-being effect of unemployment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Leonardo Becchetti, 2025. "Happiness, religiosity and rationality: going deeper into the utility function," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 72(2), pages 1-57, December.
    9. Elgin, Ceyhun & Goksel, Turkmen & Gurdal, Mehmet Y. & Orman, Cuneyt, 2013. "Religion, income inequality, and the size of the government," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 225-234.
    10. Dehejia, Rajeev & DeLeire, Thomas & Luttmer, Erzo F.P., 2007. "Insuring consumption and happiness through religious organizations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 259-279, February.
    11. Haining Wang & Zhiming Cheng & Russell Smyth, 2015. "Does Consuming More Make You Happier? Evidence from Chinese Panel Data," Monash Economics Working Papers 29-15, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    12. repec:bof:bofitp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201508181355 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Rajeev Dehejia & Thomas DeLeire & Erzo F. P. Luttmer & Josh Mitchell, 2007. "The Role of Religious and Social Organizations in the Lives of Disadvantaged Youth," NBER Chapters, in: The Problems of Disadvantaged Youth: An Economic Perspective, pages 237-274, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Ashu Tiwari & Imlak Shaikh & Archana Patro, 2018. "Insurance and risk practices: an exploration of religious texts to reveal the evolutionary development of insurance institutions," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 20(2), pages 274-292, October.
    15. Pénard, Thierry & Poussing, Nicolas & Suire, Raphaël, 2013. "Does the Internet make people happier?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 105-116.
    16. Neher, Frank, 2012. "Preferences for redistribution around the world," Discussion Papers 2012/2, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    17. Van Praag, Bernard M.S. & Romanov, Dmitri & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada, 2010. "Happiness and financial satisfaction in Israel: Effects of religiosity, ethnicity, and war," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1008-1020, December.
    18. Makridis, Christos A., 2022. "When houses of worship go empty: The effects of state restrictions on well-being among religious adherents," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Atilano Pena-López & Paolo Rungo & Beatriz López-Bermúdez, 2021. "The "Efficiency" Effect of Conceptual Referents on the Generation of Happiness: A Cross-National Analysis," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2457-2483, August.
    20. Lewis Davis & Jia Gao, 2020. "Preferences or Patriarchy: Why Do Religious Women Work Less?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 287-310, January.
    21. Jeanet Sinding Bentzen, 2019. "Acts of God? Religiosity and Natural Disasters Across Subnational World Districts," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(622), pages 2295-2321.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:334179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jums.academy/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.