IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/cempwp/cempa9-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Covid-19 and financial hardship in London

Author

Listed:
  • Richiardi, Matteo
  • Collado, Diego
  • Popova, Daria

Abstract

Using UKMOD, the UK tax-benefit microsimulation model, we analyse the impact on Londoners of the Covid-19 crisis, of the emergency policies put in place since March 2020 and of some counterfactual policy options, including the continuation of the £20 weekly uplift in Universal Credit and Working Tax Credit. Our main results can be summarised as follows: 1) The emergency measures introduced by the Government in March 2020 proved very effective at protecting the incomes of Londoners, particularly some of the most disadvantaged groups. 2) Withdrawing the £20 a week uplift to Universal Credit and Working Tax credits will put 130,000 more Londoners in poverty, with some of the most disadvantaged groups, including 60,000 lone parents, being disproportionately affected. The number of Black Londoners living in poverty would grow by 8% compared to 6% for all ethnic groups. 3) Less well-off Londoners will be worst affected, with the poorest 10% experiencing an 8% decrease in their incomes. 4) While Londoners will be more affected than the rest of the country by the withdrawal of the £20 uplift; across the UK, the poorest 10% of people will see their incomes cut by 5%. 5) On the other hand, keeping the £20 a week uplift to Universal Credit and Working Tax credits and going further by removing all the Benefit Caps would cut child poverty in London by 10%, keeping more than 70,000 children out of poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Richiardi, Matteo & Collado, Diego & Popova, Daria, 2021. "Covid-19 and financial hardship in London," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA9/21, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa9-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/cempa/cempa9-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruud A. de Mooij, 2020. "Tax Policy and Inclusive Growth," IMF Working Papers 2020/271, International Monetary Fund.
    2. De Henau, Jerome & Himmelweit, Susan & Reis, Sara, 2021. "Modelling Universal Basic Income using UKMOD," EUROMOD Working Papers EM5/21, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Richiardi, Matteo & Bronka, Patryk & Collado, Diego, 2020. "The Covid-19 crisis response helps the poor: the distributional and budgetary consequences of the UK lock-down," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA5/20, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Redmond, Paul & McGuinness, Seamus & Ciprikis, Klavs, 2022. "A Universal Basic Income for Ireland: Lessons from the international literature," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS146, June.
    2. Richiardi, Matteo, 2022. "A basic income for France: ideas for a debate," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA6/22, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Sally Torbert, 2022. "Impact Of Taxes And Transfers On Inequality In The Asia-Pacific Region," Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 29(1), pages 43-65, May.
    4. Mike Brewer & Iva Valentinova Tasseva, 2021. "Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes?," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(3), pages 433-458, September.
    5. Denisa M. Sologon & Cathal O’Donoghue & Iryna Kyzyma & Jinjing Li & Jules Linden & Raymond Wagener, 2022. "The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(4), pages 777-809, December.
    6. Wright, Gemma & Noble, Michael & Barnes, Helen & Moechtar, Ali & McLennan, David & Anshory Yusuf, Arief & Gasior, Katrin & Muyanto, Ratnawati, 2021. "Estimating the distributional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the remedial tax and benefit policies on poverty in Indonesia," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA2/21, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    7. Claudio A. Agostini & Marcela Perticara & Javiera Selman, 2023. "Tackling Vulnerable Households through a Working Tax Credit Scheme: A Feasible Alternative to Cash Transfers," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 245(2), pages 119-155, June.
    8. Glenn Abela, 2022. "Assessing the impacts of the COVID-19 wage supplement scheme: A microsimulation study," CBM Working Papers WP/06/2022, Central Bank of Malta.
    9. Valerie Cerra, 2022. "A Framework For Inclusive And Sustainable Growth In Asia And The Pacific," Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 29(1), pages 17-41, May.
    10. Ayaz, Mehmet & Fricke, Lea & Fuest, Clemens & Sachs, Dominik, 2023. "Who should bear the burden of COVID-19 related fiscal pressure? An optimal income taxation perspective," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Richiardi, Matteo & Collado, Diego & Popova, Daria, 2021. "UKMOD – a new tax-benefit model for the four nations of the UK," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA7/21, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa9-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.