IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ern/wpaper/04-2005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Opting-out previdenziale, smobilizzo del TFR e basi strutturali del pilastro privato

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Pammolli

    () (Politecnico di Milano and CERM Foundation - Competitività, Regole, Mercati)

  • Nicola Carmine Salerno

    () (Ufficio parlamentare di bilancio)

Abstract

Si parte dal presupposto metodologico che il pilastro privato non sia uno strumento deputato al trasferimento di risorse dal datore di lavoro al lavoratore. Gli obiettivi redistributivi, non ristretti all'interno del rapporto diretto tra lavoratore e proprio datore, sono affidati al sistema fiscale e anche a quella parte del sistema fiscale che riguarda il disegno delle agevolazioni agli investimenti previdenziali. Ciò posto, nel valutare le ipotesi di finanziamento del pilastro privato e di smobilizzo del TFR, non ci si può esimere dal considerare il rispetto delle compatibilità economiche tra gli attori coinvolti, cioè il rispetto del loro vincolo di bilancio. È una posizione metodologica di realismo all'interno di un'economia di mercato, necessaria a dare fondamenta solide al pilastro privato: da un lato v'è la contrattazione del costo del lavoro comprensivo di tutte le sue poste; dall'altro la scelta di avvio del pilastro privato con eventuale ricombinazione delle poste all'interno del contrattato costo del lavoro.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Pammolli & Nicola Carmine Salerno, 2005. "Opting-out previdenziale, smobilizzo del TFR e basi strutturali del pilastro privato," Working Papers CERM 04-2005, Competitività, Regole, Mercati (CERM).
  • Handle: RePEc:ern:wpaper:04-2005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cermlab.it/wp-content/uploads/cerm/wp/wpcerm-2005-04.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2005
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurwitz, Mark A & Caves, Richard E, 1988. "Persuasion or Information? Promotion and the Shares of Brand Name and Generic Pharmaceuticals," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 299-320, October.
    2. Magazzini, Laura & Pammolli, Fabio & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2004. "Dynamic Competition in Pharmaceuticals: Patent Expiry, Generic Penetration, and Industry Structure," MPRA Paper 15968, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Hudson, John, 2000. "Generic take-up in the pharmaceutical market following patent expiry: A multi-country study," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 205-221, June.
    4. Andrew Ching, 2000. "Dynamic Equilibrium in the US Prescription Drug Market After Patent Expiration," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1242, Econometric Society.
    5. Ashiya, Masahiro, 2000. "Weak entrants are welcome," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, pages 975-984.
    6. Yi, Sang-Seung, 1999. "Entry, licensing and research joint ventures," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, pages 1-24.
    7. Fabio Pammolli & Laura Magazzini & Luigi Orsenigo, 2002. "The intensity of competition after patent expiry in pharmaceuticals. A cross-country analysis," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 99(1), pages 107-131.
    8. Danzon, Patricia M. & Chao, Li-Wei, 2000. "Cross-national price differences for pharmaceuticals: how large, and why?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 159-195, March.
    9. Mukesh Eswaran, 1994. "Licensees as Entry Barriers," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 27(3), pages 673-688, August.
    10. Grabowski, Henry G & Vernon, John M, 1992. "Brand Loyalty, Entry, and Price Competition in Pharmaceuticals after the 1984 Drug Act," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(2), pages 331-350, October.
    11. Ashiya, M., 1998. "Weak Entrants are Welcome," ISER Discussion Paper 0468, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pammolli, Fabio & Riccaboni, Massimo & Oglialoro, Claudia & Magazzini, Laura & Baio, Gianluca & Salerno, Nicola, 2005. "Medical Devices Competitiveness and Impact on Public Health Expenditure," MPRA Paper 16021, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Opting-out previdenziale; smobilizzo TFR; pilastro previdenziale privato;

    JEL classification:

    • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
    • J38 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ern:wpaper:04-2005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Guido Bora`). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/cermmit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.