IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Comparison of the Anderson-Rubin test for overidentification and the Johansen test for cointegration

Listed author(s):
  • Hoogerheide, L.F.
  • van Dijk, H.K.

In this paper we discuss the similarity between the Anderson-Rubin test for overidentification in a Simultaneous Equations Model and the Johansen test for cointegration in a Vector Autoregressive model. The similar structure of the two models is shown to be important in this respect. An alternative procedure for computing the Anderson-Rubin test is given, which appears to be faster than the conventional method. The derivation of the likelihood ratio test for the hypothesis of reduced rank is given for the general case. Both the Anderson-Rubin test and the Johansen test are shown to be monotonically increasing functions of the singular values of a scaled version of the unrestricted least-squares estimator of the matrix upon which the rank restriction is imposed.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute in its series Econometric Institute Research Papers with number EI 2001-04.

in new window

Date of creation: 12 Feb 2001
Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1669
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Postbus 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam

Phone: 31 10 4081111
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RePub)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.