IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/87940.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social solidarity for all? Trade union strategies, labour market dualisation and the welfare state in Italy and South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Durazzi, Niccolo
  • Fleckenstein, Timo
  • Lee, Soohyun Christine

Abstract

Political-economic analyses of trade unions in post-industrial societies have shifted away from traditional class-analytic approaches to embrace insider/outsider and producer coalition arguments based on the assumption that unions hold on to the defence of their core constituencies in the face of labour market deregulation and dualisation. Challenging this conventional wisdom, we provide an analysis of union strategies in Italy and South Korea, two most-different union movements perceived as unlikely cases for the pursuit of broader social solidarity, and we argue that in both countries unions have successively moved away from insider-focussed strategies. We show a movement towards “solidarity for all” in the industrial relations arena as well as in their social policy preferences. Furthermore, unions also explored new avenues of political agency, often in alliance with civil society organisations. We ascribe this convergent trend towards a social model of unionism to a response of unions to a “double crisis”; that is a socio-economic crisis, which takes the form of a growing periphery of the labour market associated with growing social exclusion, and a socio-political crisis, which takes the form of a increasing marginalisation of the unions from the political process pursued by right- and left-wing parties alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Durazzi, Niccolo & Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2018. "Social solidarity for all? Trade union strategies, labour market dualisation and the welfare state in Italy and South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87940, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:87940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87940/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rebecca J Oliver & Andrew L Morelock, 2021. "Insider and outsider support for unions across advanced industrial democracies: Paradoxes of solidarity," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(2), pages 167-183, June.
    2. Cosma, Valer Simion & Ban, Cornel & Gabor, Daniela, 2020. "The Human Cost of Fresh Food: Romanian Workers and Germany's Food Supply Chains," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 10(2), December.
    3. Farai Ncube & Olabanji Oni, 2020. "Organizing Challenges Faced by Trade Unions in the Hospitality Industry of Zimbabwe," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 8(3), pages 167-181.
    4. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2019. "Roads and barriers towards social investments: comparing labour market and family policy reforms in Europe and East Asia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103001, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Mark P Thomas & Steven Tufts, 2020. "Blue Solidarity: Police Unions, Race and Authoritarian Populism in North America," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 126-144, February.
    6. Laura Carver & Virginia Doellgast, 2021. "Dualism or solidarity? Conditions for union success in regulating precarious work," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(4), pages 367-385, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:87940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.