IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/5405.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Weighted least absolute deviations estimation for ARMA models with infinite variance

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, Jiazhu
  • Wang, Hui
  • Yao, Qiwei

Abstract

For autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models with infinite variance innovations, quasi-likelihood-based estimators (such as Whittle estimators) suffer from complex asymptotic distributions depending on unknown tail indices. This makes statistical inference for such models difficult. In contrast, the least absolute deviations estimators (LADE) are more appealing in dealing with heavy tailed processes. In this paper, we propose a weighted least absolute deviations estimator (WLADE) for ARMA models. We show that the proposed WLADE is asymptotically normal, is unbiased, and has the standard root-n convergence rate even when the variance of innovations is infinity. This paves the way for statistical inference based on asymptotic normality for heavy-tailed ARMA processes. For relatively small samples numerical results illustrate that the WLADE with appropriate weight is more accurate than the Whittle estimator, the quasi-maximum-likelihood estimator (QMLE), and the Gauss–Newton estimator when the innovation variance is infinite and that the efficiency loss due to the use of weights in estimation is not substantial.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, Jiazhu & Wang, Hui & Yao, Qiwei, 2007. "Weighted least absolute deviations estimation for ARMA models with infinite variance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5405, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:5405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/5405/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chi Yao & Wei Yu & Xuejun Wang, 2023. "Strong Consistency for the Conditional Self-weighted M Estimator of GRCA(p) Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Pan, Jiazhu & Wang, Hui & Tong, Howell, 2008. "Estimation and tests for power-transformed and threshold GARCH models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 352-378, January.
    3. Rongning Wu & Richard A. Davis, 2010. "Least absolute deviation estimation for general autoregressive moving average time‐series models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 98-112, March.
    4. Ke Zhu & Shiqing Ling, 2015. "LADE-Based Inference for ARMA Models With Unspecified and Heavy-Tailed Heteroscedastic Noises," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 784-794, June.
    5. Li, Jinyu & Liang, Wei & He, Shuyuan, 2011. "Empirical likelihood for LAD estimators in infinite variance ARMA models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 212-219, February.
    6. Feiyu Jiang & Dong Li & Ke Zhu, 2019. "Non-standard inference for augmented double autoregressive models with null volatility coefficients," Papers 1905.01798, arXiv.org.
    7. Xinghui Wang & Shuhe Hu, 2017. "Asymptotics of self-weighted M-estimators for autoregressive models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 83-92, January.
    8. Ke-Ang Fu & Ting Li & Chang Ni & Wenkai He & Renshui Wu, 2021. "Asymptotics for the conditional self-weighted M-estimator of GRCA(1) models with possibly heavy-tailed errors," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1407-1419, June.
    9. Ke Zhu, 2018. "Statistical inference for autoregressive models under heteroscedasticity of unknown form," Papers 1804.02348, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    10. Jiang, Feiyu & Li, Dong & Zhu, Ke, 2020. "Non-standard inference for augmented double autoregressive models with null volatility coefficients," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 165-183.
    11. Zhu, Ke & Ling, Shiqing, 2013. "Global self-weighted and local quasi-maximum exponential likelihood estimators for ARMA-GARCH/IGARCH models," MPRA Paper 51509, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Bouhaddioui, Chafik & Ghoudi, Kilani, 2012. "Empirical processes for infinite variance autoregressive models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 319-335.
    13. Fumiya Akashi, 2017. "Self-weighted generalized empirical likelihood methods for hypothesis testing in infinite variance ARMA models," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 291-313, October.
    14. Zhang, Xingfa & Zhang, Rongmao & Li, Yuan & Ling, Shiqing, 2022. "LADE-based inferences for autoregressive models with heavy-tailed G-GARCH(1, 1) noise," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 228-240.
    15. Yang, Yaxing & Ling, Shiqing & Wang, Qiying, 2022. "Consistency of global LSE for MA(1) models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Yang, Yaxing & Ling, Shiqing, 2017. "Self-weighted LAD-based inference for heavy-tailed threshold autoregressive models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 368-381.
    17. Yining Chen, 2015. "Semiparametric Time Series Models with Log-concave Innovations: Maximum Likelihood Estimation and its Consistency," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-31, March.
    18. Xiaoyan Li & Jiazhu Pan & Anchao Song, 2023. "Geometric ergodicity and conditional self‐weighted M‐estimator of a GRCAR(p) model with heavy‐tailed errors," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 418-436, July.
    19. Mo Zhou & Liang Peng & Rongmao Zhang, 2021. "Empirical likelihood test for the application of swqmele in fitting an arma‐garch model," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 222-239, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:5405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.