IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/140866.html

Is it ok to make mistakes at work? Perceptions of differential treatment of mistakes by men and women in the workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Lordan, Grace
  • Will, Paris

Abstract

The authors examine whether women and men working in financial services have different perceptions of a hypothetical mistake at work. Using a survey of 1,485 U.K. financial-sector professionals, we analyze three self-reported measures: comfort in admitting a mistake, expected penalization for the mistake, and whether the mistake would be seen as a learning opportunity. Regression analysis relates these perceptions to the respondent's gender and the gender composition of their workplace. The results suggest that women's perceptions of mistakes are significantly more negative than men's, and this gap is amplified in male-dominated environments. In heavily-male teams (e.g., those with ≥75% men), women report feeling markedly less comfortable about mistakes and less likely to view mistakes as learning opportunities compared to men. By contrast, women report the most positive attitudes toward mistakes in environments with low shares of men, where mistakes are also most likely to be viewed as learning opportunities; men's perceptions vary comparatively little with workplace composition. In other words, male-dominated workplaces are associated with more negative perceptions of errors, especially for women.

Suggested Citation

  • Lordan, Grace & Will, Paris, 2026. "Is it ok to make mistakes at work? Perceptions of differential treatment of mistakes by men and women in the workplace," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140866, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140866/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.