IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Consumption Insurance with Heterogeneous Preferences. Can Sharecropping Help Complete Markets?

Listed author(s):
  • Pierre Dubois

    (INRA Toulouse)

Empirical tests of the complete markets hypothesis generally reject full insurance and stimulated the study of optimal risk sharing. However, most of the empirical tests of the complete markets hypothesis make strong assumptions concerning the specification of preferences. In particular, the usual rejection of full insurance may be affected by the incapacity to account for heterogeneity of risk aversion of households. Underlining the methodological problems on the identification of preferences, the direction of the tests and their power, we study the risk sharing and consumption insurance achieved by rural households from three provinces of Pakistan. We show how to deal with these methodological problems in studying consumption smoothing and implement some non directional and directional tests of market completeness. We actually find that markets are incomplete in Pakistan even at the village level and look for a possible explanation of how households try to complete markets. The risk sharing property of sharecropping is actually often called upon, but its effect on consumption smoothing has never been tested directly. We therefore present a reduced form evidence that, in Pakistan, the sharecropping institution allows to complete markets. Households able to use this contractual choice, which permits to share production risk, are better insured against idiosyncratic shocks. It seems that sharecropping provides a contingent claim that other accessible markets do not allow to replicate. This empirical fact shows that agricultural contracts play an important role sharing production risk but also through informal insurance mechanisms when markets are incomplete.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers with number 1597.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Aug 2000
Handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1597
Contact details of provider: Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.