IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Simulation-Based Finite-Sample Inference in Simultaneous Equations

Listed author(s):
  • Lynda Khalaf
  • Jean-Marie Dufour

In simultaneous equation (SE) contexts, nuisance parameter, weak instruments and identification problems severely complicate exact and asymptotic tests (except for very specific hypotheses). In this paper, we propose exact likelihood based tests for possibly nonlinear hypotheses on the coefficients of SE systems. We discuss a number of bounds tests and Monte Carlo simulation based tests. The latter involves maximizing a randomized p-value function over the relevant nuisance parameter space which is done numerically by using a simulated annealing algorithm. We consider limited and full information models. We extend, to non-Gaussian contexts, the bound given in Dufour (Econometrica, 1997) on the null distribution of the LR criterion, associated with possibly non-linear- hypotheses on the coefficients of one Gaussian structural equation. We also propose a tighter bound which will hold: (i) for the limited information (LI) Gaussian hypothesis considered in Dufour (1997) and for more general, possibly cross-equation restrictions in a non-Gaussian multi-equation SE system. For the specific hypothesis which sets the value of the full vector of endogenous variables coefficients in a limited information framework, we extend the Anderson-Rubin test to the non-Gaussian framework. We also show that Wang and Zivot's (Econometrica, 1998) asymptotic bounds-test may be seen as an asymptotic version of the bound we propose here. In addition, we introduce a multi-equation Anderson-Rubin-type test. Illustrative Monte Carlo experiments show that: (i) bootstrapping standard instrumental variable (IV) based criteria fails to achieve size control, especially (but not exclusively) under near non-identification conditions, and (ii) the tests based on IV estimates do not appear to be boundedly pivotal and so no size-correction may be feasible. By contrast, likelihood ratio based tests work well in the experiments performed

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings with number 239.

in new window

Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:239
Contact details of provider: Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.