IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dul/bpaper/2013-394021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The “Other” Child Penalty: Work Disability after Motherhood and How Paternity Leave Can Help

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Fontenay
  • Ilan Tojerow

Abstract

The paper summarized here provides a comprehensive view on how having children impacts awoman’s professional career. As such, it builds on existing studies that highlight the impact ofmotherhood on gender inequalities in the labor market, often called “child penalties” (Kleven etal, 2019). These two researchers are the first to evaluate the child penalty in the Belgian context,which amounts to a 43% long-run reduction in their earnings for women up to 8 years after thebirth of their first child.The study also highlights the existence of “another” child penalty by showing that Belgianmothers are also more likely than fathers to experience work disability after enteringparenthood. This long-run gap in work disability prevalence tends to increase with the numberof children, suggesting that it could result from family arrangements detrimental to women.Finally, the authors show that the provision of a two-week paternity leave can help lessen these“child penalties”. By exploiting a legislative reform in 2002, the researchers demonstrate thatthe introduction of paternity leave reduced the time spent by mothers on disability insurance by21% over a period of 12 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Fontenay & Ilan Tojerow, 2020. "The “Other” Child Penalty: Work Disability after Motherhood and How Paternity Leave Can Help," Dulbea Policy Brief 20.02, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:dul:bpaper:2013/394021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/394021/3/Dulbea_PolicyBrief_20.02.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dul:bpaper:2013/394021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dulbebe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.