IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diweos/diweos50.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Peer Reviews on the Fight against Terrorism a Hidden Success of EU Security Governance?

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Bossong

Abstract

This paper provides a first study on use of professional peer reviews by the EU to strengthen the European fight against terrorism. The first part outlines two theoretical approaches to assessing the outcome effectiveness of such peer reviews, namely compliance and learning. Peer reviews can serve both ends and have been increasingly touted as an effective tool to address transnational threats. The second part analyzes the evolution and impact of the EU's peer reviews on the fight against terrorism. Although the first peer review took several years to complete, it was regarded as a striking success that improved mutual trust and the coherence of the international fight against terrorism. It was therefore followed by a second peer review on consequence management in response to terrorist attacks. From a critical perspective, it is shown that the impact of these peer reviews could be doubted from both a compliance and learning perspective, as monitoring and flanking measures have remained too weak. The conclusions point to additional political or normative deficits of peer reviews in EU security policy-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Bossong, 2011. "Peer Reviews on the Fight against Terrorism a Hidden Success of EU Security Governance?," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 50, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diweos:diweos50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.377383.de/diw_econsec0050.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:101-124 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Héritier, Adrienne & Lehmkuhl, Dirk, 2008. "The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Thierry Balzacq, 2008. "The Policy Tools of Securitization: Information Exchange, EU Foreign and Interior Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 75-100, January.
    4. Monica Den Boer & Jörg Monar, 2002. "Keynote Article: 11 September and the Challenge of Global Terrorism to the EU as a Security Actor," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(s1), pages 11-28, September.
    5. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:75-100 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hendrik Hegemann, 2012. "Between Great Transformation and Politics as Usual: Formal and Informal Security Governance in EU Counterterrorism Policy," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 61, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Michael Brzoska & Raphael Bossong & Eric van Um, 2011. "Security Economics in the European Context: Implications of the EUSECON Project," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 58, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuko Suda, 2013. "Transatlantic Politics of Data Transfer: Extraterritoriality, Counter-Extraterritoriality and Counter-Terrorism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 772-788, July.
    2. Stefan Niederhafner, 2014. "The Korean Energy and GHG Target Management System: An Alternative to Kyoto-Protocol Emissions Trading Systems?," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2014118, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Sep 2014.
    3. Itay Fischhendler & David Katz, 2013. "The use of “security” jargon in sustainable development discourse: evidence from UN Commission on Sustainable Development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 321-342, September.
    4. Klaus Dingwerth, 2017. "Field Recognition and the State Prerogative: Why Democratic Legitimation Recedes in Private Transnational Sustainability Regulation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 75-84.
    5. Vitnarae Kang & Daniëlle A Groetelaers, 2018. "Regional governance and public accountability in planning for new housing: A new approach in South Holland, the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 1027-1045, September.
    6. Niclas Meyer, 2012. "Political Contestation in the Shadow of Hierarchy," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 46, European Institute, LSE.
    7. Adis Dzebo, 2019. "Effective governance of transnational adaptation initiatives," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 447-466, October.
    8. Niclas Meyer, 2012. "Political Contestation in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 6, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    9. Eyert, Florian & Irgmaier, Florian & Ulbricht, Lena, 2022. "Extending the framework of algorithmic regulation. The Uber case," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 23-44.
    10. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:27-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Scharpf, Fritz Wilhelm, 2009. "Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity," MPIfG Working Paper 09/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    12. Nicolas Schmid & Leonore Haelg & Sebastian Sewerin & Tobias S. Schmidt & Irina Simmen, 2021. "Governing complex societal problems: The impact of private on public regulation through technological change," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 840-855, July.
    13. Stef Wittendorp, 2016. "Unpacking ‘International Terrorism’: Discourse, the European Community and Counter-Terrorism, 1975–86," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 1233-1249, September.
    14. Karin Vaagland, 2021. "Crisis-Induced Leadership: Exploring the Role of the EU Commission in the EU–Jordan Compact," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 52-62.
    15. Frans Van Waarden, 2009. "Power to the legal professionals: Is there an Americanization of European law?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3), pages 197-216, September.
    16. Yongqiang Chu & Huan Zhang, 2022. "Do Age-Friendly Community Policy Efforts Matter in China? An Analysis Based on Five-Year Developmental Plan for Population Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Nazli Avdan, 2014. "Do asylum recognition rates in Europe respond to transnational terrorism? The migration-security nexus revisited," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 445-471, December.
    18. Rieper, Sarah, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility in zones of conflict," PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy 18/2013, Free University Berlin, Center for International Political Economy.
    19. Charalampos Koutalakis & Aron Buzogany & Tanja A. Börzel, 2010. "When soft regulation is not enough: The integrated pollution prevention and control directive of the European Union," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 329-344, September.
    20. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:531-554 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Reinhard Steurer, 2013. "Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(4), pages 387-410, December.
    22. Fikru, Mahelet G., 2016. "Determinants of International Standards in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of institutional pressure from different stakeholders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 296-307.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diweos:diweos50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.