IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csl/devewp/461.html

Imports and Credit Rationing: A Firm-Level Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Nucci

    (Sapienza University)

  • Filomena Pietrovito

    (University of Molise)

  • Alberto Franco Pozzolo

    (Roma Tre University and Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano)

Abstract

Firm performance is known to benefit from participation in import markets. For this reason, understanding whether credit constraints hamper firms’ ability to purchase foreign inputs is a relevant issue. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between financial constraints and imports of intermediate inputs using a large sample of small- and medium-sized enterprises from 66 developing countries. To measure credit constraints we use information from a firm’s in-depth self-assessment of its difficulties in having access to external finance. Furthermore, to tackle the endogeneity problems in the estimation, we rely on an instrumental variable approach that allows us to establish more directly the impact of financial constraints on importing activities. We provide robust evidence of a statistically and economically significant restraining effect of credit constraints on both the probability of importing intermediates (the extensive margin) and the incidence of imported intermediates in total input expenditure (the intensive margin). Moreover, we show that the impact on these margins of import is stronger for firms operating in countries where the financial system is less developed, the quality of institutions poorer and the overall level of economic freedom lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Nucci & Filomena Pietrovito & Alberto Franco Pozzolo, 2020. "Imports and Credit Rationing: A Firm-Level Investigation," Development Working Papers 461, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 25 Feb 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:csl:devewp:461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dagliano.unimi.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/WP461.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gopalan, Sasidaran & Reddy, Ketan & Sasidharan, Subash, 2022. "Does digitalization spur global value chain participation? Firm-level evidence from emerging markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Nucci, Francesco & Pietrovito, Filomena & Pozzolo, Alberto Franco, 2023. "Intermediated trade and credit constraints: The case of firm’s imports," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 201-220.
    3. Doan Ngoc Thang & Le Thanh Ha, 2022. "Trade credit and global value chain: Evidence from cross-country firm-level data," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 171, pages 110-129.
    4. Lucia Errico & Sandro Rondinella & Francesco Trivieri, 2025. "Financial Constraints and Firms’ Productivity: The Role of Participation in Global Value Chains," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1229-1253, September.
    5. Dela‐Dem Doe Fiankor & Bernhard Dalheimer & Gabriele Mack, 2025. "Pesticide regulatory heterogeneity, foreign sourcing, and global agricultural value chains," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(2), pages 611-634, March.
    6. Dolores Añon Higón & Juan A. Daniel Bonvin, 2023. "Do digitalization spurs SMEs’ participation in foreign markets?," Working Papers 2307, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csl:devewp:461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chiara Elli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damilit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.