IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2019-15.html

How Do Older Workers Use Nontraditional Jobs?

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia H. Munnell
  • Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
  • Abigail N. Walters

Abstract

Nontraditional jobs – defined here as jobs without health and retirement benefits – are on the rise, and this trend extends to older workers as well as the young. But the impact of this trend depends on how long the jobs last and what older workers do subsequently. If older workers end up in nontraditional work for much of their later careers, then the lack of benefits will put their retirements at risk. If, instead, they use nontraditional jobs only temporarily before returning to traditional work or as a bridge to retirement, these jobs may offer the flexibility that enables them to keep working and improve their retirement prospects. To address these issues, this brief, which summarizes a recent study, follows workers from ages 50-62 in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to identify how they use nontraditional jobs and the effect of these employment patterns on their retirement security. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section clarifies how the “no-benefits” definition of nontraditional work used in this analysis relates to other, more job-based, definitions. The second section describes a technique called sequence analysis, which allows for grouping the sample workers together by similar employment patterns based on how they use nontraditional work. The third section identifies the socioeconomic characteristics of the group that uses nontraditional work most frequently. The fourth section estimates, for all groups in the sequence analysis, how the different work patterns affect retirement security. The final section concludes that just 26 percent of the workers in the sample are in a traditional job with benefits throughout their 50s and early 60s, and that nontraditional jobs are clustered among frequent users rather than serving as a temporary landing spot or a bridge job for workers more generally. The group that works consistently in nontraditional jobs ends up with about 25 percent less in retirement income than those consistently in traditional jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia H. Munnell & Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher & Abigail N. Walters, 2019. "How Do Older Workers Use Nontraditional Jobs?," Issues in Brief ib2019-15, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2019-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/briefs/how-do-older-workers-use-nontraditional-jobs-2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Papadopoulos, 2020. "Reservation Wages and Work Arrangements: Evidence From The American Life Panel," SCEPA working paper series. 2020-01, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    2. Mohamed Buheji & Dunya Ahmed, 2025. "Raising the Curiosity for a Better Return on Life-Road Map for the Retirees," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 15(1), pages 114-114, December.
    3. Cheryl Carleton & Mary T. Kelly, 2022. "Happy at Work - Possible at Any Age?," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 51, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.
    4. Elisabeth Beusch & Arthur Soest, 2020. "Labour Market Trajectories of the Self-employed in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 109-146, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2019-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.