IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/14328.html

How Do Older Workers Use Nontraditional Jobs?

In: Incentives and Limitations of Employment Policies on Retirement Transitions: Comparisons of Public and Private Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia Munnell
  • Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
  • Abigail N. Walters

Abstract

Working consistently through one’s fifties and early sixties is key to attaining retirement security. However, workers also need access to retirement plans – so they can continue to accumulate resources – and health insurance – so they can avoid withdrawing assets in the event of a health shock. Yet, despite the fact that a large literature focuses on nontraditional jobs that often lack these benefits, it is unclear how older workers use these jobs and what the consequences are. This paper uses the Health and Retirement Study to identify nontraditional jobs and relies on sequence analysis to explore how workers ages 50-62 use them. The results suggest that the majority of nontraditional jobs are used by workers consistently, and that fewer workers use these jobs briefly or as a bridge to retirement. In the end, workers consistently in nontraditional jobs end up with less retirement income and are also worse off by a more holistic measure of well-being – the incidence of depression. Given this situation, expanding benefits to workers in non-traditional jobs could increase their well-being in retirement.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia Munnell & Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher & Abigail N. Walters, 2019. "How Do Older Workers Use Nontraditional Jobs?," NBER Chapters, in: Incentives and Limitations of Employment Policies on Retirement Transitions: Comparisons of Public and Private Sectors, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:14328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabeth Beusch & Arthur Soest, 2020. "Labour Market Trajectories of the Self-employed in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 109-146, March.
    2. Michael Papadopoulos, 2020. "Reservation Wages and Work Arrangements: Evidence From The American Life Panel," SCEPA working paper series. 2020-01, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    3. Mohamed Buheji & Dunya Ahmed, 2025. "Raising the Curiosity for a Better Return on Life-Road Map for the Retirees," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 15(1), pages 114-114, December.
    4. Cheryl Carleton & Mary T. Kelly, 2022. "Happy at Work - Possible at Any Age?," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 51, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:14328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.