IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

International Trade, Trade and Industrial Policy and Imperfect Competition: A Survey

Listed author(s):
  • Venables, Anthony J

The incorporation of details of industrial organisation into the study of international trade has been the subject of a fast growing recent literature which is surveyed in this paper. Whereas the conventional theory of trade deals almost exclusively with perfect competition and non-increasing returns to scale, the new literature models imperfect competition, increasing returns to scale and product differentiation. In Section 2, I discuss how adding imperfect competition to trade theory generates new insights for our understanding of such phenomena as intra-industry trade. With imperfect competition and increasing returns to scale, trade may affect welfare by changing the degree of competition, firm scale, and the number of product varieties available in an economy. Section 3 of the paper examines the extent to which free trade achieves these potential gains from trade under a variety of different types of competition and market structure. In the presence of imperfect competition there is generally scope for the active use of policy to raise welfare through changes in the terms of trade or by correcting distortions in the domestic economy. Sections 4 and 5 discuss the roles of both commercial and industrial policy, and show that the effects of policy are quite sensitive to the type of competition and market structure in the industry under study. Section 6 discusses the effects of one country's policy on other countries, and the role of coordinated commercial and industrial policy.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Paper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 74.

in new window

Date of creation: Oct 1985
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:74
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ.

Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820

Order Information: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.