IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20290.html

The Complexity Premium

Author

Listed:
  • Fuchs, Johann
  • Gersbach, Hans
  • Schmassmann, Samuel

Abstract

We introduce a task-based framework for modeling production in which certain tasks are too complex for many workers to perform. In such an environment, workers’ wages may significantly diverge from their relative productivities: Workers with marginally higher skill levels may obtain a large additional wage premium on top of the skill premium, which we call complexity premium. We apply our framework to explain past employment and wage polarization and estimate model parameters for the U.S. labor market between 2001 and 2019. Beyond a rising skill level and skill premium, we find that the complexity of tasks increases and employees performing more complex tasks earn a significant complexity premium, which accounts for up to 43 percent of their wages. Finally, we explore the effects of artificial intelligence and find it may aggravate wage inequality, with an ambiguous effect on complexity premia.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuchs, Johann & Gersbach, Hans & Schmassmann, Samuel, 2025. "The Complexity Premium," CEPR Discussion Papers 20290, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20290
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.