IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19462.html

Are Women More Exposed to Firm Shocks?

Author

Listed:
  • Baghai, Ramin
  • Silva, Rui
  • Soares, Margarida

Abstract

Workers care deeply about job security and pay stability. Given potentially differing risk attitudes between men and women, we examine whether gender differences exist in employee exposure to idiosyncratic firm shocks. Using a comprehensive employer-employee matched dataset, we find significant gender disparities in how firm shocks affect workers: women's wages are 25% more elastic and their dismissal rates are 34% more sensitive to firm performance shocks than those of their male colleagues. These gender differences are larger for employees with children, in small firms, and in firms without female executives. Our results uncover a gender gap in firm insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Baghai, Ramin & Silva, Rui & Soares, Margarida, 2024. "Are Women More Exposed to Firm Shocks?," CEPR Discussion Papers 19462, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19462
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G52 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Insurance
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.