IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/143.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Government Deficits, Private Investment and the Current Account: An Intertemporal Disequilibrium Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • van Wijnbergen, Sweder

Abstract

We use a model with full intertemporal optimization and short-run rigidities in the real wage of the Fischer-Gray type to demonstrate the effects of deficit spending in different employment regimes. We allow for prices to exhibit upward flexibility, although once set at the beginning of one period they will be downwardly rigid until the beginning of the next period. We show that, conditional on a plausible assumption about public and private sector discount rates, under Keynesian unemployment deficit spending reduces unemployment, improves the future terms of trade and therefore leads to an increase in private investment (crowding-in) and to a deterioration of the current account. Under classical unemployment, goods markets clear but unemployment persists because of contract-based real wage rigidity. Fiscal expansion then goes partly into prices (terms of trade improvement) and only partly into quantities. The latter occurs to the extent that contract based real consumption wage rigidity, coupled with a terms of trade improvement, allows a lower real product wage. A temporary increase in government expenditure in classical unemployment leads to a bigger terms of trade improvement today than tomorrow, so both income and substitution effects lead to a current account improvement. The cost of capital increases more than the value of future output and investment falls. This also improves the first period current account. The direct impact of increased first period government expenditure may offset these surprising positive effects on the first period current account. Finally we show that the more open the economy is, the larger is the output response and the smaller the price response to a fiscal expansion in the presence of classical unemployment. This contrasts with the Keynesian unemployment regime, where a higher import component in expenditure leads to more dissipation of effective demand and smaller output effects.

Suggested Citation

  • van Wijnbergen, Sweder, 1986. "Government Deficits, Private Investment and the Current Account: An Intertemporal Disequilibrium Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 143, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=143
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghassibe, Mishel & Zanetti, Francesco, 2022. "State dependence of fiscal multipliers: the source of fluctuations matters," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-23.
    2. Singh, Tarlok, 2004. "On the optimizing model of the balance of trade in India," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 605-625, July.
    3. Otero, Jesus G., 2000. "Coffee, economic fluctuations and stabilisation: an intertemporal disequilibrium model with capital market imperfections," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 105-129, June.
    4. Tarlok Singh, 2007. "Intertemporal Optimizing Models Of Trade And Current Account Balance: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 25-64, February.
    5. Cebula, Richard J., 1995. "The impact of federal government budget deficits on economic growth in the united states: an empirical investigation, 1955-1992," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 245-252.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.