IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

How to determine the contributions of domestic demand and exports to economic growth?

  • Henk Kranendonk


  • Johan Verbruggen


There are two methods in use to determine the contributions of expenditure categories to economic growth. In the conventional 'international method', total imports are deducted from exports, whereas in what is known as the 'Dutch method', final and intermediary imports are allocated to all expenditure categories. Although the Dutch method is a little more complex than the international method, it has the considerable advantage that the contributions of the expenditure categories to GDP growth can be better compared, producing a better understanding of the composition of GDP growth. This memorandum discloses the Dutch method and illustrates the differences in perception which the two methods produced for the years 1999 to 2004. The findings are that the international method underestimates the importance of exports for GDP growth and overestimates the importance of domestic expenditure categories, like private consumption and investments.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis in its series CPB Memorandum with number 129.

in new window

Date of creation: Nov 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cpb:memodm:129
Contact details of provider: Postal: Postbus 80510, 2508 GM Den Haag
Phone: (070) 338 33 80
Fax: (070) 338 33 50
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpb:memodm:129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.