IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cor/louvrp/2813.html

Smooth strongly convex interpolation and exact worst-case performance of first-order methods

Author

Listed:
  • Adrien B. TAYLOR
  • Julien M. HENDRICKX
  • François GLINEUR

Abstract

We show that the exact worst-case performance of fixed-step first-order methods for smooth (possibly strongly) convex functions can be obtained by solving convex programs. Finding the worst-case performance of a black-box first-order method is formulated as an optimization problem over a set of smooth (strongly) convex functions and initial conditions. We develop closed-form necessary and sufficient conditions for smooth (strongly) convex interpolation, which provide a finite representation for those functions. This allows us to reformulate the worst-case performance estimation problem as an equivalent finite dimension-independent semidefinite optimization problem, whose exact solution can be recovered up to numerical precision. Optimal solutions to this performance estimation problem provide both worst-case performance bounds and explicit functions matching them, as our smooth (strongly) convex interpolation procedure is constructive. Our works build on those of Drori and Teboulle in [8] who introduced and solved relaxations of the performance estimation problem for smooth convex functions. We apply our approach to different fixed-step first-order methods with several performance criteria, including objective function accuracy and residual gradient norm. We conjecture several numerically supported worst-case bounds on the performance of the gradient, fast gradient and optimized fixed-step methods, both in the smooth convex and the smooth strongly convex cases, and deduce tight estimates of the optimal step size for the gradient method.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Adrien B. TAYLOR & Julien M. HENDRICKX & François GLINEUR, 2017. "Smooth strongly convex interpolation and exact worst-case performance of first-order methods," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2813, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  • Handle: RePEc:cor:louvrp:2813
    Note: In : Mathematical Programming Series A, 161, 307-345, 2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrien B. Taylor & Julien M. Hendrickx & François Glineur, 2018. "Exact Worst-Case Convergence Rates of the Proximal Gradient Method for Composite Convex Minimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 455-476, August.
    2. Sandra S. Y. Tan & Antonios Varvitsiotis & Vincent Y. F. Tan, 2021. "Analysis of Optimization Algorithms via Sum-of-Squares," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 56-81, July.
    3. Hadi Abbaszadehpeivasti & Etienne Klerk & Moslem Zamani, 2024. "On the Rate of Convergence of the Difference-of-Convex Algorithm (DCA)," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 475-496, July.
    4. Vrins, F. & Jeanblanc, M., 2015. "The [phi]-Martingale," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015022, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Ernest K. Ryu & Bằng Công Vũ, 2020. "Finding the Forward-Douglas–Rachford-Forward Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 858-876, March.
    6. TAYLOR, Adrien B. & HENDRICKX, Julien M. & François GLINEUR, 2016. "Exact worst-case performance of first-order methods for composite convex optimization," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2016052, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Guoyong Gu & Junfeng Yang, 2024. "Tight Ergodic Sublinear Convergence Rate of the Relaxed Proximal Point Algorithm for Monotone Variational Inequalities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 373-387, July.
    8. Rieger, Janosch & Tam, Matthew K., 2020. "Backward-Forward-Reflected-Backward Splitting for Three Operator Monotone Inclusions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    9. Donghwan Kim & Jeffrey A. Fessler, 2021. "Optimizing the Efficiency of First-Order Methods for Decreasing the Gradient of Smooth Convex Functions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 192-219, January.
    10. Abbaszadehpeivasti, Hadi & de Klerk, Etienne & Zamani, Moslem, 2022. "The exact worst-case convergence rate of the gradient method with fixed step lengths for L-smooth functions," Other publications TiSEM 061688c6-f97c-4024-bb5b-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Nikita Kornilov & Mohammad Alkousa & Eduard Gorbunov & Fedor Stonyakin & Pavel Dvurechensky & Alexander Gasnikov, 2025. "Intermediate Gradient Methods with Relative Inexactness," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 207(3), pages 1-42, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cor:louvrp:2813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alain GILLIS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/coreebe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.