IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chy/respap/131chedp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regulating competition in the NHS

Author

Listed:
  • Diane Dawson

Abstract

In December 1994 the Department of Health published guidelines intended to inform participants in the NHS internal market of current government policy with respect to mergers and anti-competitive behaviour. The Guide focused on four topics: provider mergers and joint ventures, providers in difficulty, purchaser mergers and collusion. The policies outlined in the Guide are drawn from traditional models of competition policy as applied to private sector firms except that it would appear the Department of Health is intended to act in place of the usual institutions of competition policy such as the Monopolies and Mergers Commission. This paper questions the Government’s approach on two broad grounds. First, there is an inherent conflict of interest between the Department’s role in rationalising capacity in the NHS and enforcement of competition policy. If there is to be a competition policy, it should not be internally administered. Second, private sector competition policy based on maintenance of excess capacity and new entry is an inappropriate and potentially inefficient framework for regulating competition between public sector firms. Treasury and Department of Health rules create financial constraints on the ways public sector firms (Trusts) are able to compete. These constraints have the effect of concentrating market power in the hands of purchasers not providers. A competition policy designed to regulate competition within the public sector is likely to be very different from the traditional models with which we are familiar.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane Dawson, 1995. "Regulating competition in the NHS," Working Papers 131chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:131chedp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/CHE%20Discussion%20Paper%20131.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1995
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin Milne & Magnus McGee, 1992. "Compulsory competitive tendering in the NHS: a new look at some old estimates," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 96-111, August.
    2. Chalkley, M. & Malcomson, J.M., 1995. "Contracts and competition in the NHS," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 9513, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Office of Health Economics, 1998. "Competition and contestability between acute hospitals," Monograph 000433, Office of Health Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michal Plaček & Martin Schmidt & František Ochrana & Michal Půček, 2017. "Do the Selected Characteristics of Public Tenders Affect the Likelihood of Filing Petitions with the Regulators of Public Tenders?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(3), pages 317-329.
    2. Paul H. Jensen & Robin E. Stonecash, 2004. "The Efficiency of Public Sector Outsourcing Contracts: A Literature Review," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2004n29, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    3. Andersson, Fredrik & Jordahl, Henrik, 2011. "Outsourcing Public Services: Ownership, Competition, Quality and Contracting," Working Paper Series 874, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    4. Stefan Szymanski, 1996. "The impact of compulsory competitive tendering on refuse collection services," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Diane Dawson, 2001. "The private finance initiative: a public finance illusion?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(6), pages 479-486, September.
    6. Smith, Peter C. & Stepan, Adolf & Valdmanis, Vivian & Verheyen, Piet, 1997. "Principal-agent problems in health care systems: an international perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 37-60, July.
    7. Csaba, Ivan & Fenn, Paul, 1997. "Contractual choice in the managed health care market An empirical analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 579-588, October.
    8. Robin G. Milne & Robert E. Wright, 2004. "Competition and Costs: Evidence from Competitive Tendering in the Scottish National Health Service," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Vining, Aidan R. & Globerman, Steven, 1999. "Contracting-out health care services: a conceptual framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 77-96, January.
    10. Michal Plaček & Martin Schmidt & František Ochrana & Michal Půček, . "Do the Selected Characteristics of Public Tenders Affect the Likelihood of Filing Petitions with the Regulators of Public Tenders?," Prague Economic Papers, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    11. Robin G. Milne, 1997. "Market-type Mechanisms, Market Testing and Market Making: A Longitudinal Study of Contractor Interest in Tendering," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 543-559, April.
    12. Paul H. Jensen & Robin E. Stonecash, 2005. "Incentives and the Efficiency of Public Sector‐outsourcing Contracts," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(5), pages 767-787, December.
    13. Suzanne Young, 2002. "Outsourcing and Downsizing: Processes of Workplace Change in Public Health," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 13(2), pages 244-269, December.
    14. Brian Ferguson, 1996. "Progress of the UK health reforms and the role of information: what can the "dismal science" contribute?," Working Papers 145chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:131chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gill Forder (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.