IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp1933.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Knowledge spillovers from clean innovation. A tradeoff between growth and climate?

Author

Listed:
  • Ralf Martin
  • Dennis Verhoeven

Abstract

Innovation policy faces a tradeoff between growth and climate objectives when the knowledge spillover externality from clean innovation is low compared to other sectors. To make such a comparison, we use patent data to estimate field-specific spillover returns generated by R&D support. Supporting Clean presents itself as a win-win opportunity, yielding global returns one-eighth higher than those of an untargeted policy. Nevertheless, only a modest portion of the returns stays within country borders, raising the question of whether national interests distort efficient allocation. Our policy simulations underscore the benefits of supranational coordination in clean innovation policy, potentially boosting returns by approximately 25% for the EU and over 60% globally. Moreover, the EU benefits strongly from US Clean innovation spillovers, impacting the debate on the Inflation Reduction Act. Overall, we identify no explicit innovation policy tradeoff in tackling the twin challenges of economic growth and climate change but emphasize the necessity for international cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralf Martin & Dennis Verhoeven, 2023. "Knowledge spillovers from clean innovation. A tradeoff between growth and climate?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1933, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1933.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; knowledge spillovers; clean technology; innovation policy; green transition; net-zero; patent data; Economic geography; Green Growth; Productivity; Technological change;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.