IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Cross-Sectional Firm Dynamics: Theory and Empirical Results from the Chemical Sector

Listed author(s):
  • R Koopmans
  • A Lamo
Registered author(s):

The literature on the dynamics of industry structure has generated very few robust empirical predictions. The paper shows that if one particular assumption is made about the pay off structure of an investment project, three well known games, a modified 'Grab the Dollar' game, an auction and a stochastic race all have identical (robust) empirical predictions. The assumed structure of pay offs applies particularly well to the chemical sector. The theoretical implication is that small firms are more likely to install new capacity than their larger competitors, leading to a tendency of firm sizes to converge. We show that the conventional empirical approach using discrete choice models is inappropriate in this context, due to Galton's Fallacy. Using a novel method to study empirical firm dynamics, by analysing dynamically evolving cross-section distributions and by that exploiting time series and cross-section information more fully than standard cross-section regressions, we show that there is a strong tendency of firm sizes to converge in the chemicals sector.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers with number dp0229.

in new window

Date of creation: Mar 1995
Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0229
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.