IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdp/texdis/td691.html

Ecological Economics As A Framework For The Achievement Of Environmental And Socioeconomic Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Andre Braz Golgher

    (Cedeplar/UFMG)

Abstract

Ecological economics is a transdisciplinary attempt to deal with complex non-linear systems of humans and nature, merging aspects of economics, environmental economics, ecology and environmental studies, among others knowledge fields. This paper introduces some of the concepts of this field initially describing the Anthropocene and planet boundaries, the impossibility of continuous economic growth, the necessity of decreasing inequality levels, failures of market allocation, and human nature and well-being. Besides, the paper illustrates policies addressing sustainable scale, inequality levels and problems of market allocation having as background the Brazilian reality. In addition, the paper presents a pluralistic perspective of ecological economics, including some ongoing debates among prominent researchers in the field. Hence, this paper proposes to be a didactic introduction of ecological economics illustrated with applications from Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Andre Braz Golgher, 2025. "Ecological Economics As A Framework For The Achievement Of Environmental And Socioeconomic Sustainability," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 691, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/pesquisas/td/TD%20691.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Costanza & Jon D. Erickson & Joshua Farley & Ida Kubiszewski, 2020. "Introduction: what is ecological economics and why do we need it now more than ever," Chapters, in: Robert Costanza & Jon D. Erickson & Joshua Farley & Ida Kubiszewski (ed.), Sustainable Wellbeing Futures, chapter 1, pages 1-15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Muradian, Roldan & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, 2021. "Beyond ecosystem services and nature's contributions: Is it time to leave utilitarian environmentalism behind?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. André Golgher & Marcos Callisto & Robert Hughes, 2023. "Improved Ecosystem Services and Environmental Gentrification after Rehabilitating Brazilian Urban Streams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Steinberger, Julia K., 2017. "A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 43-52.
    5. Baltruszewicz, Marta & Steinberger, Julia K. & Paavola, Jouni & Ivanova, Diana & Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Owen, Anne, 2023. "Social outcomes of energy use in the United Kingdom: Household energy footprints and their links to well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    6. Spash, Clive L., 2013. "The shallow or the deep ecological economics movement?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 351-362.
    7. Verhofstadt, E. & Van Ootegem, L. & Defloor, B. & Bleys, B., 2016. "Linking individuals' ecological footprint to their subjective well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elke Pirgmaier & Julia K. Steinberger, 2019. "Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Riepl, Tobias & Schaffartzik, Anke & Grabow, Simon & Banabak, Selim, 2025. "Living well with the foundational economy: Assessing the spatial accessibility of foundational infrastructures in Vienna and the relationship to socio-economic status," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Baltruszewicz, Marta & Steinberger, Julia K. & Paavola, Jouni & Ivanova, Diana & Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Owen, Anne, 2023. "Social outcomes of energy use in the United Kingdom: Household energy footprints and their links to well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Sarah-Louise Ruder & Sophia Rose Sanniti, 2019. "Transcending the Learned Ignorance of Predatory Ontologies: A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Goddard, Jessica J. & Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2019. "Keeping multiple antennae up: Coevolutionary foundations for methodological pluralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Londres, Marina & Schmink, Marianne & Börner, Jan & Duchelle, Amy E. & Frey, Gabriel Ponzoni, 2023. "Multidimensional forests: Complexity of forest-based values and livelihoods across Amazonian socio-cultural and geopolitical contexts," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Zabaloy, Maria Florencia & Viego, Valentina, 2022. "Household electricity demand in Latin America and the Caribbean: A meta-analysis of price elasticity," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Spash, Clive L., 2017. "The Need for and Meaning of Social Ecological Economics," SRE-Discussion Papers 2017/02, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    9. Muhammad Awais & Tanzila Samin & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Jinsoo Hwang & Muhammad Zubair, 2020. "Unfolding the Association between the Big Five, Frugality, E-Mavenism, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Horn, Stefan & Gough, Ian & Rogers, Charlotte & Tunstall, Rebecca, 2025. "Meeting housing needs within planetary boundaries: A UK case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, 2015. "Energy, growth, and evolution: Towards a naturalistic ontology of economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 432-442.
    13. Strunz, Sebastian & Klauer, Bernd & Ring, Irene & Schiller, Johannes, 2014. "Between Scylla and Charybdis: On the place of economic methods and concepts within ecological economics," UFZ Discussion Papers 26/2014, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    14. Vita, Gibran & Ivanova, Diana & Dumitru, Adina & Mira, Ricardo García & Carrus, Giuseppe & Stadler, Konstantin & Krause, Karen & Wood, Richard & Hertwich, Edgar, 2019. "Happier with less? Members of European environmental grassroots initiatives reconcile lower carbon footprints with higher life satisfaction and income increases," SocArXiv 3at5z, Center for Open Science.
    15. Olivier Petit & Philippe Méral & Iratxe Calvo-Mendieta & Hélène Melin, 2023. "Dynamics of socio-ecological transformation of territories: what contribution from social ecological economics? [Dynamiques de transformation socio-écologique des territoires : quelle contribution de la socio-économie écologique ?]," Post-Print hal-04164329, HAL.
    16. Balint Horvath & Miriam Bahna & Csaba Fogarassy, 2019. "The Ecological Criteria of Circular Growth and the Rebound Risk of Closed Loops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Locatelli, Bruno & Benra, Felipe & Geneletti, Davide & Loft, Lasse & Loos, Jacqueline & Schröter, Barbara & Winkler, Klara & Zoderer, Brenda Maria, 2025. "Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Román-Collado, Rocío & Colinet, Maria José, 2018. "Is energy efficiency a driver or an inhibitor of energy consumption changes in Spain? Two decomposition approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 409-417.
    19. Clive L. Spash, 2024. "Exploring economic dimensions of social ecological crises: A reply to special issue papers," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(2), pages 216-245, April.
    20. Rachelle K. Gould & Austin Himes & Lea May Anderson & Paola Arias Arévalo & Mollie Chapman & Dominic Lenzi & Barbara Muraca & Marc Tadaki, 2024. "Building on Spash's critiques of monetary valuation to suggest ways forward for relational values research," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(2), pages 139-162, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gustavo Britto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.