IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt5vj1h92m.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Safe Routes to Transit Program Evaluation Final Report

Author

Listed:
  • Sanders, Rebecca L.
  • Weinzimmer, David
  • Dittrich, Heidi
  • Cooper, Jill F.

Abstract

Safe Routes to Transit (SR2T) was initiated in 2004 with the adoption of the San Francisco Bay Area’s Regional Measure 2 which established a $1 increase in Bay Area bridge tolls. The intended purpose of this funding was to support various transportation projects within the region in order to reduce congestion along the seven state-owned toll bridge corridors. Consistent with this purpose, the SR2T Program was awarded $20 million to fund enhancements to increase walking and cycling to regional transit stations. SR2T funds were used for the following improvements, among others: ssecure bicycle storage at transit stations; safety enhancements for pedestrian and bicycle station access to transit stations/stops; removal of pedestrian/bicycle barriers near transit stations; and system-wide transit enhancements to accommodate bicyclists or pedestrians. MTC collaborated with Fehr & Peers and the UC Berkeley Safe Transportation Research and Education Center (SafeTREC) to oversee the assessment of the SR2T program on mode share, perceived traffic safety, traffic behaviors and perceived air quality. Additional data was collected to obtain economic feedback on spending behavior as related to mode choice. Transit stations were chosen based on key variables associated with travel behavior and mode choice, such as population density, employment density, and the percentage of households living beneath the poverty line. The transit stations included in the before and after study were the Balboa Park, Bay Fair, Civic Center, Glen Park, Lafayette, and Pittsburg BART stations, as well as the Palo Alto Transit station. Fremont and Rockridge BART stations were the control sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanders, Rebecca L. & Weinzimmer, David & Dittrich, Heidi & Cooper, Jill F., 2014. "Safe Routes to Transit Program Evaluation Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5vj1h92m, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5vj1h92m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5vj1h92m.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cervero, Robert & Round, Alfred & Goldman, Todd & Wu, Kang-Li, 1995. "Rail Access Modes and Catchment Areas for the BART System," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt07k76097, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Sungjin, 2008. "Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users’ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0ct7c30p, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Weinzimmer, David & Sanders, Rebecca L. & Dittrich, Heidi & Cooper, Jill F., 2014. "Evaluation of the Safe Routes to Transit Program in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3wv3g18b, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Lin, Ting (Grace) & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Robinson, Todd P. & Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Church, Richard L. & Olaru, Doina & Tapin, John & Han, Renlong, 2014. "Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: a case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 111-120.
    4. Tilahun, Nebiyou & Thakuriah, Piyushimita (Vonu) & Li, Moyin & Keita, Yaye, 2016. "Transit use and the work commute: Analyzing the role of last mile issues," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 359-368.
    5. Margherita Pazzini & Claudio Lantieri & Annalisa Zoli & Andrea Simone & Hocine Imine, 2023. "Evaluation of Railway Station Infrastructure to Facilitate Bike–Train Intermodality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Cervero, Robert & Caldwell, Benjamin & Cuellar, Jesus, 2012. "Bike-and-Ride: Build It and They Will Come," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3fd9x0fx, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Liu, Chang & Bardaka, Eleni, 2021. "The suburbanization of poverty and changes in access to public transportation in the Triangle Region, NC," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Kenneth Joh & Sandip Chakrabarti & Marlon G. Boarnet & Ayoung Woo, 2015. "The Walking Renaissance: A Longitudinal Analysis of Walking Travel in the Greater Los Angeles Area, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Chidambara, 2019. "Walking the First/Last Mile to/from Transit: Placemaking a Key Determinant," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 183-195.
    10. Cervero, Robert & Landis, John, 1997. "Twenty years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system: Land use and development impacts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 309-333, July.
    11. Lin, Ting (Grace) & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Robinson, Todd P. & Olaru, Doina & Smith, Brett & Taplin, John & Cao, Buyang, 2016. "Enhanced Huff model for estimating Park and Ride (PnR) catchment areas in Perth, WA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 336-348.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; Safe Routes to Transit; pedestrians; bicyclists; safeTREC;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5vj1h92m. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.