IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt95g2v3dz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Carlink II: Research Approach and Early Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Shaheen, Susan

Abstract

CarLink II is a commuter-based carsharing pilot project administered by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis (ITS-Davis) in conjunction with Caltrans, American Honda Motor Company, and Caltrain. Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH) researchers are conducting the evaluation. Launched in Summer 2001, CarLink II continues the investigation of commuter-based carsharing that was originally explored in the 1998 CarLink longitudinal survey (Shaheen, 1999) and the 1999 CarLink I field test (Shaheen et al., 2000). Lessons learned during the CarLink I field test helped guide the project team’s design of the CarLink II project, resulting in several differences and improvements. The original CarLink I field test ran from January to November, 1999 and featured 54 individuals sharing 12 natural gas powered Honda Civics. The vehicles were based at the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station in Dublin/Pleasanton, the eastern terminus of the BART system. The shared cars were equipped with smart technologies including tracking, communication, and reservation systems to facilitate access and logistics. The model incorporated transit-based carsharing for traditional and reverse commute travel patterns, as well as a day-use fleet application, tested at a major employment centerthe Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).

Suggested Citation

  • Shaheen, Susan, 2004. "Carlink II: Research Approach and Early Findings," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt95g2v3dz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt95g2v3dz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/95g2v3dz.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean Doherty & Eric Miller, 2000. "A computerized household activity scheduling survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 75-97, February.
    2. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt9w53q5xq is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt20f9s84f is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt3q69g29p is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee-Gosselin, Martin & Miranda-Moreno, Luis F., 2009. "What is different about urban activities of those with access to ICTs? Some early evidence from Québec, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 104-114.
    2. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt8f8803dx is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Xuan Liu & John M. Usher, 2016. "Modeling air passengers’ rescheduling strategies for airport service lines based on an empirical study with the aid of a virtual 3-D computer graphic environment," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 57-84, March.
    4. Luis Miranda-Moreno & Martin Lee-Gosselin, 2008. "A week in the life of baby boomers: how do they see the spatial–temporal organization of their activities and travel?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 629-653, August.
    5. Dujuan Yang & Harry Timmermans & Aloys Borgers, 2016. "The prevalence of context-dependent adjustment of activity-travel patterns in energy conservation strategies: results from a mixture-amount stated adaptation experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 79-100, January.
    6. Sheila Ferrer & Tomás Ruiz, 2017. "Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 27-48, January.
    7. Zuoxian Gan & Min Yang & Tao Feng & Harry Timmermans, 2020. "Understanding urban mobility patterns from a spatiotemporal perspective: daily ridership profiles of metro stations," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 315-336, February.
    8. Ron Buliung & Matthew Roorda & Tarmo Remmel, 2008. "Exploring spatial variety in patterns of activity-travel behaviour: initial results from the Toronto Travel-Activity Panel Survey (TTAPS)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 697-722, November.
    9. Zhou, Jianyu (Jack) & Golledge, Reginald, 2007. "Real-time tracking of activity scheduling/schedule execution within a unified data collection framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 444-463, June.
    10. Fang, Zhixiang & Tu, Wei & Li, Qingquan & Li, Qiuping, 2011. "A multi-objective approach to scheduling joint participation with variable space and time preferences and opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 623-634.
    11. Clarke Wilson, 2006. "Reliability of Sequence-Alignment Analysis of Social Processes: Monte Carlo Tests of Clustalg Software," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(1), pages 187-204, January.
    12. Tommy Gärling & Kay Axhausen, 2003. "Introduction: Habitual travel choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Ying Hui & Mengtao Ding & Kun Zheng & Dong Lou, 2017. "Observing Trip Chain Characteristics of Round-Trip Carsharing Users in China: A Case Study Based on GPS Data in Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Watcharasukarn, Montira & Page, Shannon & Krumdieck, Susan, 2012. "Virtual reality simulation game approach to investigate transport adaptive capacity for peak oil planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 348-367.
    15. Cecilia Jakobsson & Satoshi Fujii & Tommy Gärling, 2002. "Effects of economic disincentives on private car use," Transportation, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 349-370, November.
    16. Dujuan Yang & Harry Timmermans & Aloys Borgers, 2016. "The prevalence of context-dependent adjustment of activity-travel patterns in energy conservation strategies: results from a mixture-amount stated adaptation experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 79-100, January.
    17. Khandker Habib & Eric Miller, 2008. "Modelling daily activity program generation considering within-day and day-to-day dynamics in activity-travel behaviour," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 467-484, July.
    18. Deal, David, 2008. "Time for play – An exploratory analysis of the changing consumption contexts of digital games," MPRA Paper 11655, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Linda Nijland & Theo Arentze & Harry Timmermans, 2014. "Multi-day activity scheduling reactions to planned activities and future events in a dynamic model of activity-travel behavior," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 71-87, January.
    20. Talia McCray & Nicole Brais, 2007. "Exploring the Role of Transportation in Fostering Social Exclusion: The Use of GIS to Support Qualitative Data," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 397-412, December.
    21. Ming Lee & Michael McNally, 2006. "An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 553-565, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt95g2v3dz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.