IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt7jn8h79x.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Making Bicycling Comfortable: Identifying Minimum Infrastructure Needs by Population Segments Using a Video Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Fitch, Dillon
  • Carlen, Jane
  • Handy, Susan

Abstract

In this study, researchers use survey data to analyze bicycling comfort and its relationship with socio-demographics, bicycling attitudes, and bicycling behavior. An existing survey of students, faculty, and staff at UC Davis (n=3089) who rated video clips of bicycling environments based on their perceived comfort as a part of the UC Davis annual Campus Travel Survey (CTS) is used. The video clips come from a variety of urban and semi-rural roads (designated California state highways) around the San Francisco Bay Area where bicycling rates vary. Results indicate considerable effects of socio-demographics and attitudes on absolute video ratings, but relative agreement about which videos are most comfortable and uncomfortable across population segments. In addition, presence of bike infrastructure and low speed roads are the strongest video factors generating more comfortable ratings. However, the results suggest that even the best designed on-road bike facilities are unlikely to provide a comfortable bicycling environment for those without a predisposition to bicycle. This suggests that protected and separated bike facilities may be required for many people to consider bicycling. Nonetheless, the results provide guidance for improving roads with on-street bike facilities where protected or separated facilities may not be suitable. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Fitch, Dillon & Carlen, Jane & Handy, Susan, 2020. "Making Bicycling Comfortable: Identifying Minimum Infrastructure Needs by Population Segments Using a Video Survey," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7jn8h79x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7jn8h79x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7jn8h79x.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griswold, Julia B. & Yu, Mengqiao & Filingeri, Victoria & Grembek, Offer & Walker, Joan L., 2018. "A behavioral modeling approach to bicycle level of service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 166-177.
    2. Susan Handy & Yan Xing & Theodore Buehler, 2010. "Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: a study of six small U.S. cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 967-985, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bonsma-Fisher, Madeleine & Lin, Bo & Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Saxe, Shoshanna, 2024. "Exploring the geographical equity-efficiency tradeoff in cycling infrastructure planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Fitch, Dillon T. & Carlen, Jane & Handy, Susan L., 2022. "What makes bicyclists comfortable? Insights from a visual preference survey of casual and prospective bicyclists," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 434-449.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fitch, Dillon T. & Carlen, Jane & Handy, Susan L., 2022. "What makes bicyclists comfortable? Insights from a visual preference survey of casual and prospective bicyclists," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 434-449.
    2. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda & German A. Barrero & Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, 2022. "Towards an enriched framework of service evaluation for pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure: acknowledging the power of users’ perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 791-814, June.
    3. Downward, Paul & Rasciute, Simona, 2015. "Assessing the impact of the National Cycle Network and physical activity lifestyle on cycling behaviour in England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 425-437.
    4. Jie Gao & Dick Ettema & Marco Helbich & Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis, 2019. "Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2441-2463, December.
    5. Verma, Meghna & Rahul, T.M. & Reddy, Peesari Vamshidhar & Verma, Ashish, 2016. "The factors influencing bicycling in the Bangalore city," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 29-40.
    6. Maas, Suzanne & Nikolaou, Paraskevas & Attard, Maria & Dimitriou, Loukas, 2021. "Examining spatio-temporal trip patterns of bicycle sharing systems in Southern European island cities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Cai, Yangqian & Moreno, Ana Tsui, 2024. "Identifying non-universal heterogeneity of preferences of leisure cyclists for rural highway environments: A latent-class model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Maness, Michael & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2016. "An indirect latent informational conformity social influence choice model: Formulation and case study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 75-101.
    9. Ali Enes Dingil & Federico Rupi & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2021. "An Integrative Review of Socio-Technical Factors Influencing Travel Decision-Making and Urban Transport Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Çelebi, Dilay & Yörüsün, Aslı & Işık, Hanife, 2018. "Bicycle sharing system design with capacity allocations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 86-98.
    11. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    12. Hamid Mostofi & Houshmand Masoumi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2020. "The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services and the Bicycle Mode Choice in Tehran and Cairo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Rybarczyk, Greg & Gallagher, Laura, 2014. "Measuring the potential for bicycling and walking at a metropolitan commuter university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Liang Ma & Jennifer Dill & Cynthia Mohr, 2014. "The objective versus the perceived environment: what matters for bicycling?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1135-1152, November.
    15. Olafsson, Anton Stahl & Nielsen, Thomas Sick & Carstensen, Trine Agervig, 2016. "Cycling in multimodal transport behaviours: Exploring modality styles in the Danish population," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 123-130.
    16. Gutiérrez, Margareth & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2025. "Willingness to change compulsory trips to bicycle: Role of habit, perceptions and the built environment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Shuhong Ma & Yechao Zhou & Zhoulin Yu & Yan Zhang, 2019. "College Students’ Shared Bicycle Use Behavior Based on the NL Model and Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Creemers, Lieve & Tormans, Hans & Bellemans, Tom & Janssens, Davy & Wets, Geert & Cools, Mario, 2015. "Knowledge of the concept Light Rail Transit: Exploring its relevance and identification of the determinants of various knowledge levels," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 31-43.
    19. Yiling Deng & Pengjun Zhao, 2023. "The determinants of shared bike use in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Goeverden, C.D. van & Boer, E. de, 2013. "School travel behaviour in the Netherlands and Flanders," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 73-84.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7jn8h79x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.