IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/econwp/qt23n3n3dg.html

Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science

Author

Listed:
  • Brodeur, Abel
  • Esterling, Kevin
  • Ankel-Peters, Jörg
  • Bueno, Natália S
  • Desposato, Scott
  • Dreber, Anna
  • Genovese, Federica
  • Green, Donald P
  • Hepplewhite, Matthew
  • de la Guardia, Fernando Hoces
  • Johannesson, Magnus
  • Kotsadam, Andreas
  • Miguel, Edward
  • Velez, Yamil R
  • Young, Lauren

Abstract

This article reviews and summarizes current reproduction and replication practices in political science. We first provide definitions for reproducibility and replicability. We then review data availability policies for 28 leading political science journals and present the results from a survey of editors about their willingness to publish comments and replications. We discuss new initiatives that seek to promote and generate high-quality reproductions and replications. Finally, we make the case for standards and practices that may help increase data availability, reproducibility, and replicability in political science.

Suggested Citation

  • Brodeur, Abel & Esterling, Kevin & Ankel-Peters, Jörg & Bueno, Natália S & Desposato, Scott & Dreber, Anna & Genovese, Federica & Green, Donald P & Hepplewhite, Matthew & de la Guardia, Fernando Hoces, 2024. "Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt23n3n3dg, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt23n3n3dg
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/23n3n3dg.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balafoutas, Loukas & Celse, Jeremy & Karakostas, Alexandros & Umashev, Nicholas, 2025. "Incentives and the replication crisis in social sciences: A critical review of open science practices," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Buchner, Martin & Rose, Julian & Johannesson, Magnus & Malan, Mandy & Ankel-Peters, Jörg, 2025. "Seeking Scientific Consensus - An Expert Survey on the Replication Debate between Acemoglu et al. (2001) and Albouy (2012)," I4R Discussion Paper Series 270, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    3. Mußhoff, Oliver & Ölkers, Tim & Kirchner, Ella, 2024. "A note on the discussion regarding terrorism and land use in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Brodeur, Abel & Valenta, David & Marcoci, Alexandru & Aparicio, Juan P. & Mikola, Derek & Barbarioli, Bruno & Alexander, Rohan & Deer, Lachlan & Stafford, Tom, 2025. "Comparing Human-Only, AI-Assisted, and AI-Led Teams on Assessing Research Reproducibility in Quantitative Social Science," IZA Discussion Papers 17645, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Casas, Andreu & Dagher, Georgia & O'Loughlin, Ben, 2025. "Academic Access to Social Media Data for the Study of Political Online Safety," SocArXiv 7pcjd, Center for Open Science.
    6. Daniel Homocianu, 2025. "Global Patterns of Parental Concerns About Children’s Education: Insights from WVS Data," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-47, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt23n3n3dg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibbrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.