IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

'Consumer Welfare' and Article 82EC: Practice and Rhetoric

  • Pinar Akman

    ()

    (Centre for Competition Policy and Norwich Law School, University of East Anglia)

Registered author(s):

    This paper questions whether the objective of Article 82EC is indeed enhancing ‘consumer welfare’ as suggested by the EC Commission when one examines the application of the provision thus far. It critically analyses the case law of the EC Commission and Courts to show that there is great dissonance between the practice and the policy declarations on the provision. When one considers the practice alongside the rhetoric, Article 82EC appears as a provision enforced without a clear standard of harm leading to doubts about the legitimacy of enforcement. The article suggests that without a properly defined standard applied in actual decisions by the EC Commission and upheld by the EC Courts, the modernisation of Article 82EC cannot succeed.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia in its series Working Papers with number 08-25.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 26 pages
    Date of creation: Jul 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-25
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Norwich, NR4 7TJ
    Phone: +44(0)1603 593715
    Fax: +44(0)1603 591622
    Web page: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cheryl Whittkaer)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Cheryl Whittkaer to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.