IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Insolvency, Employment Protection and Corporate Restructuring: The effects of TUPE

Listed author(s):
  • J.Armour
  • S.Deakin
Registered author(s):

    The statutory protection currently provided by UK law to employees during transfers of undertakings and other restructurings has been criticised on the grounds that it undermines insolvency procedures and interferes with the 'rescue' process. We present an analysis which suggests that granting employees contingent control rights may be an efficient means of recognising their firm-specific human capital. Case-study evidence shows that while in some situations employment interests to be factored into the bargaining process so as to enhance the survival chances of enterprises undergoing restructing. the law functions best when effective mechanisms of employee representation are in place and when the conditions under which employees' acquired rights can be waived in the interests of preserving employment are clearly specified. When these institutional conditions are met, employment law performs an economically-valuable role in expressing the interests of employee-stakeholders in the firm.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge in its series Working Papers with number wp204.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Jun 2001
    Handle: RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp204
    Note: PRO-2
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ruth Newman and Georgie Cohen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.