IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug26/06.html

A flexible, heterogeneous treatment-effects difference-in-differences estimator for repeated cross-sections

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Zabel

    (Tufts University)

  • Partha Deb

    (Hunter College of the City University of New York)

  • Edward C. Norton

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

The difference-in-differences (DID) study design is an important tool for causal inference. A commonly observed special case involves a staggered entry into treatment. In this context, the observation that the standard two-way fixed-effects estimator that assumes a constant treatment effect across cohorts and time can produce a biased estimate of the overall treatment effect has led to several new approaches for dealing with both staggered timing and heterogeneous treatment effects (for example, Callaway and Sant’Anna 2021). In Deb et al. (https://www.nber.org/papers/w33026, 2025), we show that an appropriate regression specification using a pooled repeated cross-sectional sample can provide consistent treatment effects in a DID design with staggered entry under the usual DID assumptions. Our flexible linear model estimated by ordinary least squares with covariates (X)—FLEX—allows the covariates to enter the model in a flexible way. To be precise, we prove that FLEX is equivalent to an imputation estimator derived in Borusyak et al. (2024). In this presentation, we will describe FLEX and the associated Stata command, flexdid. We will illustrate the use of FLEX with an empirical example and provide comparisons with some benchmark estimators.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:boc:usug26:06
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: http://repec.org/usug2026/US26_Deb.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug26:06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.