IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/neur24/08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Causal inference with time-to-event outcomes under competing risk

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Michael Gran

    (Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology (OCBE))

Abstract

The occurrence of competing events often complicate the analysis of time-to-event outcomes. While there is a rich literature in the area of survival analysis on methods for handling competing risk that goes back a long way, there has also for a long time been some confusion regarding best approach and implementation when facing competing events in applied research. Recent advances in the use of estimands in causal inference has led to new developments and insights (and discussions) on how to best analyze time-to-event outcomes under competing risk. The role of classical statistical estimands are now better understood, and new causal estimands have been suggested for addressing more advanced causal questions. In this talk, I will briefly review this development and the estimation of the most basic estimands and discuss some extensions, such as when interest is in the effect of time-varying treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Michael Gran, "undated". "Causal inference with time-to-event outcomes under competing risk," Northern European Stata Conference 2024 08, Stata Users Group.
    • Handle: RePEc:boc:neur24:08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/neur2024/Northern_Europe24_Gran.pdf
    File Function: presentation materials
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Beyersmann & Christine Schrade, 2017. "Florence Nightingale, William Farr and competing risks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 285-293, January.
    2. John P. Klein & Per Kragh Andersen, 2005. "Regression Modeling of Competing Risks Data Based on Pseudovalues of the Cumulative Incidence Function," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 223-229, March.
    3. Mats J. Stensrud & Jessica G. Young & Vanessa Didelez & James M. Robins & Miguel A. Hernán, 2022. "Separable Effects for Causal Inference in the Presence of Competing Events," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(537), pages 175-183, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annalisa Orenti & Patrizia Boracchi & Giuseppe Marano & Elia Biganzoli & Federico Ambrogi, 2022. "A pseudo-values regression model for non-fatal event free survival in the presence of semi-competing risks," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Michael J. Martens & Brent R. Logan, 2018. "A group sequential test for treatment effect based on the Fine–Gray model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1006-1013, September.
    3. Marie Skov Breum & Anders Munch & Thomas A. Gerds & Torben Martinussen, 2024. "Estimation of separable direct and indirect effects in a continuous-time illness-death model," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 143-180, January.
    4. Jasmin Rühl & Sarah Friedrich, 2024. "Asymptotic properties of resampling‐based processes for the average treatment effect in observational studies with competing risks," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 51(4), pages 1506-1532, December.
    5. Yosra Yousif & Faiz Elfaki & Meftah Hrairi & Oyelola Adegboye, 2022. "Bayesian Analysis of Masked Competing Risks Data Based on Proportional Subdistribution Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-10, August.
    6. Erik T. Parner & Per K. Andersen & Morten Overgaard, 2020. "Cumulative risk regression in case–cohort studies using pseudo-observations," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 639-658, October.
    7. Mathur, Maya B & Shpitser, Ilya, 2024. "Reflections on evolving conceptions of selection bias," OSF Preprints 7xjnk, Center for Open Science.
    8. Su, Pei-Fang & Chi, Yunchan & Li, Chung-I & Shyr, Yu & Liao, Yi-De, 2011. "Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time for paired and clustered right-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1617-1628, April.
    9. Wycinka Ewa & Jurkiewicz Tomasz, 2019. "Survival Regression Models For Single Events And Competing Risks Based On Pseudo-Observations," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 20(1), pages 171-188, March.
    10. Frank Eriksson & Thomas Scheike, 2015. "Additive gamma frailty models with applications to competing risks in related individuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 677-686, September.
    11. Zijing Yang & Chengfeng Zhang & Yawen Hou & Zheng Chen, 2023. "Analysis of dynamic restricted mean survival time based on pseudo‐observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3690-3700, December.
    12. Deresa, Negera Wakgari & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2020. "A multivariate normal regression model for survival data subject to different types of dependent censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Sangbum Choi & Xuelin Huang, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of semiparametric mixture component models for competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 588-598, September.
    14. Michael J. Martens & Brent R. Logan, 2020. "Group sequential tests for treatment effect on survival and cumulative incidence at a fixed time point," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 603-623, July.
    15. M. A. Nicolaie & J. C. van Houwelingen & T. M. de Witte & H. Putter, 2013. "Dynamic Pseudo-Observations: A Robust Approach to Dynamic Prediction in Competing Risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1043-1052, December.
    16. Karin Biering & Torsten Toftegaard Nielsen & Kurt Rasmussen & Troels Niemann & Niels Henrik Hjollund, 2012. "Return to Work after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Predictive Value of Self-Reported Health Compared to Clinical Measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    17. Yuxue Jin & Tze Leung Lai, 2017. "A new approach to regression analysis of censored competing-risks data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 605-625, October.
    18. Joshi, Amol M. & Hemmatian, Iman, 2018. "How do legal surprises drive organizational attention and case resolution? An analysis of false patent marking lawsuits," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1741-1761.
    19. Jacobo de Uña‐Álvarez & Micha Mandel, 2018. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities for a general progressive multi‐state model under cross‐sectional sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1203-1212, December.
    20. Wycinka Ewa, 2019. "Competing Risk Models of Default in the Presence of Early Repayments," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 99-120, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:neur24:08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.